Subject: ForCES Requirements Issue summary: Vague use of the word hop

From: "Putzolu, David" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 09:39:39 -0700

All,

We have rough consensus on the ForCES requirements
as they currently stand.  The vague use of the word "hop"
came up as a final issue, and the sense of the list
that I am seeing is that it should be clarified to be
"L3 routing hop".  This can be done during the author's 
48 hour period from the RFC editor.

Hormuzd, please prepare a note for the RFC editor that
specifies where the changes are that will be made to address
the hop issue.  In the meanwhile,  I am asking our ADs to
take the ForCES requirements document to IESG review during
the next scheduled IESG conference call.

Thanks,
David