Subject: ForCES Protocol Evaluation Draft accepted as WG Document (was: Comment, Protocol text deadlines)

From: "Putzolu, David" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:34:36 -0700

All,

The consensus of the working group is to accept this document
as a working group item.  Note that due to IETF submission 
deadlines the document will not appear on the WG page until 
after the upcoming meeting.

It is now up to the protocol proposal authors to fill in the 
various sections for their protocols by November 21, which 
will be the deadline for additions or changes.  Authors must
send me content for inclusion by that date.  I can provide a
MS Word template if authors prefer to use that over a text 
file.  I will revise and update the document with new content
as it arrives.

As indicated below, protocol proposal authors may provide text
by Thursday, October 23, if they want to have content in this
draft in time for uploading before the upcoming IETF meeting.

Cheers,
David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Putzolu, David 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 8:38 AM
> To: 'Forwarding and Control Element Separation'
> Subject: Comment, Protocol text deadlines (was: RE: [FORCES] 
> ForCES Protocol Evaluation Draft - Please review & send feedback!)
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> Please comment by Friday 10/17 on whether 
>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-putzolu-forces-evaluation-00.t
xt
> is acceptable or not as a WG draft. 
> 
> 
> Hormuzd Khosravi wrote:
> > By when would you like the protocol authors to have the sections
> > completed ?
> 
> Protocol team authors wishing to provide content for this document
> in time for the upcoming IETF must get me their text by Thursday,
> October 23.  Note that the template may change to some degree based
> on feedback received by 10/17, so it is optional for each protocol
> team to determine if they want to present material at this IETF about
> their protocol in this document or not.
> 
> The final deadline for contributing to the protocol evaluation 
> document will be November 21, after which the WG will evaluate
> the protocols based on the contents of the document.
> 
> -David
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Forwarding and Control Element Separation 
> > [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Khosravi, 
> Hormuzd M
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 4:17 PM
> > To: [email-masked]
> > Subject: Re: [FORCES] ForCES Protocol Evaluation Draft - 
> > Please review & send feedback! (was: FW: I-D 
> > ACTION:draft-putzolu-forces-evaluation-00.txt)
> > 
> > 
> > Hi David
> > 
> > The draft looks like a good starting point to add the 
> > protocol details.
> > I think it should be accepted as a WG document.
> > By when would you like the protocol authors to have the sections
> > completed ?
> > 
> > Pls do let us know.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Hormuzd
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Forwarding and Control Element Separation
> > [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Putzolu, David
> > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 9:56 AM
> > To: [email-masked]
> > Subject: [FORCES] ForCES Protocol Evaluation Draft - Please review &
> > send feedback! (was: FW: I-D
> > ACTION:draft-putzolu-forces-evaluation-00.txt)
> > 
> > 
> > All,
> > 
> > I have submitted a template document for use in
> > protocol evaluation.  The format and contents is 
> > based on similar efforts done in other IETF working
> > groups. The URL is:
> > 
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-putzolu-forces-evalu
> > ation-00.t
> > xt
> > 
> > Please do the following:
> > * Review the template and send suggestions
> >   for additional or changed criteria or sections.  
> > * Indicate whether this is acceptable as a working
> >   group document or not. Once accepted as a WG
> >   document authors will be asked to begin filling
> >   out the various sections.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > David
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email-masked] 
> > [mailto:[email-masked]]
> > On Behalf Of [email-masked]
> > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 9:41 AM
> > Cc: [email-masked]
> > Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-putzolu-forces-evaluation-00.txt
> > 
> > 
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> > directories.
> > 
> > 
> >         Title           : ForCES Protocol Evaluation Draft
> >         Author(s)       : D. Putzolu
> >         Filename        : draft-putzolu-forces-evaluation-00.txt
> >         Pages           : 12
> >         Date            : 2003-10-6
> > 	
> > This document provides an evaluation of the applicability of three 
> > proposed approaches for a ForCES protocol: FACT[2], GRMP[3], and 
> > Netlink2[4]. A summary of each of the proposed protocols 
> against the 
> > ForCES requirements[5] and the ForCES framework[6] is provided. 
> > Compliancy of each of the protocols against each requirement is 
> > detailed.  A conclusion summarizes how each of the 
> protocols fares in 
> > the evaluation.
> > 
> > A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-putzolu-forces-evalu
> ation-00.t
> xt
> 
> To remove yourself from the IETF Announcement list, send a message to 
> ietf-announce-request with the word unsubscribe in the body of the
> message.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the
> username
> "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in,
> type "cd internet-drafts" and then
>         "get draft-putzolu-forces-evaluation-00.txt".
> 
> A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in
> http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html 
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail.
> 
> Send a message to:
>         [email-masked].
> In the body type:
>         "FILE 
> /internet-drafts/draft-putzolu-forces-evaluation-00.txt".
> 	
> NOTE:   The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in
>         MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility.  To use this
>         feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE"
>         command.  To decode the response(s), you will need 
> "munpack" or
>         a MIME-compliant mail reader.  Different MIME-compliant mail
> readers
>         exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with
>         "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have 
> been split
>         up into multiple messages), so check your local 
> documentation on
>         how to manipulate these messages.
>         	
>         	
> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
> Internet-Draft.
>