Subject: Re: [issue71] FE Protocol LFB required?

From: "Wang,Weiming" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:43:59 +0800

closed as being accepted.

Weiming

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ellen M Deleganes" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 9:39 AM
Subject: [issue71] FE Protocol LFB required?

New submission from Ellen M Deleganes <[email-masked]>:

Section 6.2.1, Shouldn't the "MAY" be a "MUST"? Isn't it a requirement that an
FE contain one and only one instance of a FE protocol LFB? It seems like the
CE wouldn't be able to control the FE if it didn't contain this logical LFB.

----------
category: Editorial
draft: draft-ietf-forces-protocol
messages: 372
nosy: ellen
priority: Should fix
status: No discussion
title: FE Protocol LFB required?

___________________________________________________
Forces issue tracker <[email-masked]>
<http://www.mip4.org/issues/tracker/forces/issue71>
___________________________________________________