Subject: Re: [Geojson] [media-types] Review request for application/geo+json media type registration

From: Erik Wilde <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:04:40 -0800

hello mark.

thanks for the feedback.

On 2016-01-14 06:39, Mark Baker wrote:
>> I think the WG has also made enough changes
>> to the format (deprecation of coordinate reference systems and coordinate
>> position items beyond x, y, and z, for examples) to warrant a new media
>> type.
> Well that could certainly change the balance in favour of a new type.
> Could you elaborate on the compatibility between the old and new
> formats?

that sounds like a good idea, and 
https://github.com/geojson/draft-geojson/issues/125 is proposing to add 
a section explaining the changes (and that might be useful to have 
regardless of whether there's a new media type or not). so we'll get 
back to you shortly with a first stab of the difference between the 
media types.

cheers,

dret.

-- 
erik wilde | mailto:[email-masked] |
            | http://dret.net/netdret    |
            | http://twitter.com/dret    |