Subject: [GSMP] Proposed agenda 54th IETF gsmp wg

From: Kenneth Sundell <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 16:21:47 +0200

Hi,
here follows the current/proposed agenda for IETF 54th GSMP WG meeting.
Please bring up any agenda item not currently covered.
The meeting is scheduled for 1 hour this time.  

Agenda:
Agenda Bashing

Issues and Problems

- draft-ietf-gsmp-reqs-02.txt - Jonathan Sadler

- draft-choi-gsmp-optical-extension-00.txt - Gyu Myoung Lee
- draft-cha-gsmp-management-00.txt - Gyu Myoung Lee

Status on partition draft
- draft-ietf-gsmp-dyn-part-reqs-01.txt

Structure of GSMP Specification

-------------------------------------------------------------------

A reminder, to quote Loa and George of the MPLS WG

 > It is not the purpose of a WG session to have
 > presentation of the content of a document. It
 > is assumed that all attendees will have read the
 > drafts in advance of the meeting.
 >
 > For documents that are work-in-progress, the
 > presentation should cover issues resolved since
 > the last draft followed by open issues and
 > controversial topics with the intent to reach a
 > resolution of said issues and topics.
 >
 > For new work items, the presentation should focus on
 > what the problem is and why it is necessary for the
 > work group to address it.  Further it should be either
 > shown how it falls within the existing charter or why
 > and how the charter should be extended to encompass it.
 > The solution should only be sketched.
 >
 > The appropriate way of bringing new work to the working
 > group is to send a draft to the mailing list and promoting
 > discussion on the list. Slots on the agenda should be used
 > to discuss outstanding topics that has not be solved on the
 > mailing list.
 >
 > For new proposals addressing issues where
 > work-in-progess the presentation should focus
 > on the (perceived) short-fallings of the existing
 > work and why those issues need to be addressed
 > both in terms of why they are required and why they
 > cannot be addressed in the existing work.
 > the new work must be related to existing work (i.e.
 > compatible, mutually exclusive, outright replacement).
 > Finally, the new solution should be skechted,
 > explaining how the solution overcomes those issues.
 > The primary purpose of this last part is to allow commentary
 > from the floor, it should not be orientented toward selling
 > the idea.
 >
 > In all cases only a limited number of slides should be used.
 > Speakers should budget their at least 25% of their time to
 > allow for questions.
 >
 > Loa and George

Regards,
Ken and Avri

_______________________________________________
GSMP mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gsmp