Subject: Re: [http-state] wrt documenting current practice or/and specifying new beharvior

From: =JeffH <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:49:02 -0700

Bil Corry <[email-masked]> wrote:
 >
 > I agree having the attention and buy-in of UA/browser implementors is good,
 > but I don't think it's entirely necessary for phase 1 (descriptive/normative
 > spec) as all we're doing is documenting existing behavior and specifying
 > specific behaviors for maximum interoperability.

Their buy-in isn't necessarily needed for the "descriptive" work -- but I think 
it is for any "normative" work, otherwise we'll have 2109/2965 all over again.

=JeffH