Subject: Re: NEW ISSUE: Sort 1.3 Terminology

From: Mark Nottingham <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 12:07:06 +1100

Added as i52;
   http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/index.html#i52

On 2006/12/22, at 9:34 AM, Travis Snoozy (Volt) wrote:

>
> It's irritating to try and look up definitions in section 1.3.  
> IMHO, the entries really should be sorted alphabetically, despite  
> the fact that the terms have dependencies on one another.
>
> -- Travis
>

--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/