Subject: Re: New issue: 6.1.1 can on a quick reading be misread that it's a complete list of status codes

From: Mark Nottingham <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:58:27 +1000

Now issue 56;
   http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i56

On 2007/01/11, at 10:23 PM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> The second sentence in the first paragraph can on a quick reading be
> misread as section 10 contains a complete definiton of all possible
> status codes, where it in reality only has the status codes defined by
> this RFC.
>
> Change
>
> These codes are fully defined in section 10.
>
> Into
>
> The status codes defined by this RFC is fully defined in section 10.
>
> hinting that it's a good idea to read further..
>
> Regards
> Henrik

--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/