Subject: Re: #282: Recommend minimum sizes for protocol elements

From: Julian Reschke <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:59:30 +0200

On 2011-06-30 11:06, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2011-06-22 02:58, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/282>
>>
>> Combined proposal:
>> ...
>
> Looks good so far, with 20K replaced by 4000 octets, as discussed in
> this thread.
>
> Question: I'm not sure servers actually send 413 when the *header
> fields* are too big -- does anybody know for sure? Otherwise we should
> test...
>
> Best regards, Julian

OK, with <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1323> I 
have applied the proposed text, slightly modified not to mention status 
413 for now (see separate issue #299).

Best regards, Julian