Subject: Proposal for closing with no action: #247 / #322 / #266 / #340

From: Mark Nottingham <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:28:45 +0200

At yesterdays F2F meeting, we discussed closing the issues enumerated in the subject with no action.

For context, see <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/9>.

Specifically - 

#247 - it was pointed out that adding this information to the registry requires a means of maintaining it, and given that the final registry policies are likely to be established post-bis (see previous e-mail), it seems reasonable to punt on this for now.

#322 - Several people have expressed that Origin is a term that's relevant in a specific context, and shouldn't be more generally applied to other parts of HTTP. 

#266 - Any micro syntax we come up with will not be able to be applied to the headers defined in our documents, so this work can be segmented into a separate draft.

#340 - We don't define semantics for CR, nor do we allow it without a following LF, so this is error handling, and any implementation that does something special with it is already pretty broken.

Please review and speak up if you believe these issues can't be closed without action.

Regards,

--
Mark Nottingham
http://www.mnot.net/