Subject: Re: #464, was: p7: editorial suggestions

From: Julian Reschke <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 18:50:10 +0200

On 2013-05-01 01:29, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Let's move p6 and p7's sections, then.
> ...

Done, plus some more cleanup to make things more consistent across 
documents.

While doing so, I noticed we didn't have required fields for status code 
definitions; I have added:

>    A registration MUST include the following fields:
>
>    o  Status Code (3 digits)
>
>    o  Short Description
>
>    o  Pointer to specification text

(consistent with warn codes).

Best regards, Julian