Subject: Re: rfc5987bis and common structure | Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)

From: Julian Reschke <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 23:01:05 +0100

On 2016-10-15 10:29, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> --------
> In message <[email-masked]>, Kari Hurtta writes
> :
>
>> Headers which may use rfc5987bis are then "uncommon structure".
>
> I think rfc5987 is a bad idea, and it is one of my motivations for
> pushing for Common Structure.
>
>> "Content-Disposition" and "Link" are not mentioned
>> on draft-kamp-httpbis-structure.
>
> No, I only surveyed RFC723x.
> ...

Content-Disposition already fits.

Link could be integrated by allowing the coded-URL production as identifier.

(And we might we want to discuss whether coded-URL should be allowed as 
value as well).

Best regards, Julian