Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-12

From: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 20:02:53 +0900

Hi Valery,
Here is the revised draft of I2NSF Monitoring Interface:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-13

Parick and I have addressed your comments from page 35 in the attached
revision letter.

Thanks for your help to improve our draft.

Best Regards,
Paul

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:44 PM Valery Smyslov via Datatracker <
[email-masked]> wrote:

> Reviewer: Valery Smyslov
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I am the assigned ART directorate reviewer for this document. These
> comments
> were written primarily for the benefit of the ART area directors.  Document
> editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last
> call
> comments.
>
> The document defines an information model and the YANG data model for an
> interface used for monitoring Network Security Functions in the I2NSF
> framework.
>
> Issues.
>
> 1. The YANG Data Model contains human-readable strings, like "src-user",
> "message", etc. From description of thees fields they seem to contain a
> free-form text with no indication in which language it is written. Section
> 4.2
> of BCP 18 requires that protocols that transfer text MUST provide for
> carrying
> information about the language of that text (e.g. via language tags).
>
> 2. There are a number of 32-bit counters in the model. In high performance
> networks they would wrap around after a relatively short period of time.
> It is
> not clear how this situation is handled.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> I2nsf mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
>