Subject: [iccrg] Fwd: [Spud] New SPUD requirements and use cases

From: Brian Trammell <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:06:30 -0300

FYI, all,

since SPUD was just mentioned in Michael's presentation in ICCRG, new versions of the documents are now available.

Cheers,

Brian

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Brian Trammell <[email-masked]>
> Subject: [Spud] New SPUD requirements and use cases
> Date: 4 April 2016 at 14:40:02 GMT-3
> To: [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]
> 
> Greetings, all,
> 
> We've published new versions of the SPUD requirements and use cases documents.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-trammell-spud-req/
> 
> The -02 revision of the requirements document represents a major reorganization. Requirements concerning security and privacy have been pulled out into a separate section, and some open questions (with respect to tube identifiers, out-of-band signaling) resolved. Diffs are at https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-trammell-spud-req-02.txt
> 
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kuehlewind-spud-use-cases/
> 
> The -01 revision is a major revision of the document, adding a "first principles" section and new use cases (PMTUD, reordering sensitivity exposure, and in-band measurement). Sections have been reordered, and we've made a lot of editorial changes, too.
> 
> Please direct discussion of these documents to [email-masked]. Though there's no scheduled session to discuss SPUD this time, we're both in Buenos Aires this week if you'd like to talk in the hallways.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Brian and Mirja
> _______________________________________________
> Spud mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud