Subject: Re: [Ice] Draft new: draft-holmberg-ice-premature-00

From: Christer Holmberg <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 14:57:50 +0000

I have no concerns __

Regards,

Christer

On 01/03/2019, 16.56, "Ice on behalf of Ari Keränen" <[email-masked] on behalf of [email-masked]> wrote:

    ICE WG,
    
    This draft suggests a small but important fix to the standardized ICE procedures. We are now considering adopting this draft and getting it published as soon as possible. Please have a look at it and let us know if you have any concerns on this way forward.

    Cheers,
    Ari

    > On 27 Feb 2019, at 17.09, Christer Holmberg <[email-masked]> wrote:
    > 
    > Hi, 
    >  
    > Today, 8445 defines that if an ICE endpoint discards its candidates and is not able to form candidate pairs, or when the test of all pairs fail, the ICE agent will trigger ICE failure.
    >  
    > The ICE agent may do this before it has received any connectivity checks from the remote peer, and such connectivity checks might trigger candidate pairs that work.
    >  
    > Me and Justin put together a draft that updates RFC 8445, by indicating that an ICE agent should wait (there is a suggested duration) for remote connectivity checks before it triggers ICE failure.
    >  
    > Link:
    >  
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-holmberg-ice-premature/
    >  
    > For the GitHub fans:
    >  
    > https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-ice-premature
    >  
    > Regards,
    >  
    > Christer
    
    _______________________________________________
    Ice mailing list
    [email-masked]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice