Subject: Re: [Icnrg-harmonization] Name types

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 15:00:13 +0000

Those definitions of a prefix name, exact name, and full name have remained stable.

Marc

On 9/1/16, 7:25 AM, "Icnrg-harmonization on behalf of Paul Polakos (ppolakos)" <[email-masked] on behalf of [email-masked]> wrote:

    Borje,
    
    see the Differences slides here:
    
    https://github.com/icnrg/convergence/tree/master/meetings/2016-07-28
    
    Also, all of the material that was presented during the weekly calls (and the call minutes and recordings) are available through this link:
    
    https://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/icnrg/convergence/meetings
    
    Hope this helps,
    paul
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Icnrg-harmonization [mailto:[email-masked]] On
    > Behalf Of Börje Ohlman
    > Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 04:28
    > To: [email-masked]
    > Subject: [Icnrg-harmonization] Name types
    > 
    > In Berlin we worked out some definitions of exact name, full name, etc.
    > 
    > As I haven’t followed the discussion during summer and don’t exactly remember
    > what we said there I wonder if these definitions have evolved during the summer
    > and where they are documented?
    > 
    > 	Börje
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Icnrg-harmonization mailing list
    > [email-masked]
    > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg-harmonization
    _______________________________________________
    Icnrg-harmonization mailing list
    [email-masked]
    https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg-harmonization