Subject: [icnrg] nits on the -03 messages and semantics documents

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:56:19 +0000

This email is about the current nits I’ve received on the documents.  Please contact me or this list with other questions or nits.

The statement in the semantics document should be re-worded, as a forwarded cannot control what it receives.  Also, the behavior specified in the messages document should be removed so all behavior is in the semantics document.

draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnxsemantics-03

When an Interest is received from another forwarder, the HopLimit MUST be positive.

 draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnxmessages-03

  It is an error to receive an Interest with a 0 hop-limit from a remote node.