Subject: In favor of bit for "regular vs extended" type of extended community.

From: "Bruno Rijsman" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 11:28:24 -0400

Jeffrey> It would greatly simplify things if we used a bit to
Jeffrey> distinguish regular vs. extended types.  This would
Jeffrey> clarify the spec and, I believe, can be made to be
Jeffrey> backwards compatable with the current one.
Jeffrey> [more...]

I am strongly in favor of the change suggested by Jeffrey.
If find the current form of the draft very confusing and
inconsistent and I think it would benefit greatly from
this change (assuming it can be done in a backwards compatible
way). We might want to call it the "value size bit" (to avoid
confusion caused by a term like "extended type extended community").

-- Bruno Rijsman

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx