Subject: Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4360 (4944)

From: Job Snijders <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:49:57 +0100

resending, mailman rejected the many recipients

----- Forwarded message from Job Snijders <[email-masked]> -----

Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:45:08 +0100
From: Job Snijders <[email-masked]>
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <[email-masked]>
Cc: RFC Errata System <[email-masked]>, "Srihari R Sangli (rsrihari)" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]"
	<[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]"
	<[email-masked]>, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]"
	<[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4360 (4944)

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 09:26:48PM +0000, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) wrote:
> Reject.
> This will waste people's time opening the errata to try to find the
> difference.  The original makes sense and looks fine.

seconded.

Only after reading Jakob's phrase "waste of time" i realised what to
look for and saw the difference. :-)

Kind regards,

Job

----- End forwarded message -----