Subject: RE: [Ieprep] <draft-schulzrinne-ieprep-resource-req-00.txt>

From: "Gunn, Janet NE" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 11:44:39 -0400

Ken, 
I have an earlier response from Henning that says: "Yes, just an incomplete
sentence. Should read:

 Thus, it is conceivable that the
priority indication can sometimes cause preemption, while otherwise it
just influences whether requests are queued instead of discarded and
what queueing policy is being applied."

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Carlberg [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:13 AM
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [Ieprep] (no subject)

Henning,

...

also, in page 3 you have the following...

>   Priority mechanisms can be roughly categorized by whether they use a
>   priority queue for resource attempts or whether they preempt existing
>   resource uses (e.g., calls). The choice between these mechanisms
>   depends on the operational needs and characteristics of the network,
>   e.g., on the number of active requests in the system and the fraction
>   of prioritized calls. Generally, if the number of prioritized calls
>   is small compared to the system capacity and the system capacity is
>   large, it is likely that another call will naturally terminate in
>   short order when a higher-priority call arrives. Thus, it is
>   conceivable that the system indication can sometimes cause
>   preemption, while otherwise it just

...it looks like the last sentence has been accidently chopped off.

-ken

_______________________________________________
Ieprep mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep

_______________________________________________
Ieprep mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep