Subject: Re: [Ieprep] Re: draft-ietf-ieprep-requirements-01

From: "Beard, Cory" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 09:20:41 -0600

> Until such time as you get other organisations and other
> countries to represent themselves here and present their 
> perspectives, preferably in their own documents about what 
> services they use today and plan to use in the future, the 
> rest of us (who aren't monetarily or 
> contractually
> beholden to NCS) can only realistically know that the document 
> represents
> your views based on your experience at NCS.

I agree with you that other organizations should be represented.

That said, however, how might one expect that the "requirements" (wish list) would change?  Do we believe other organizations would want much less?  Much more?  Something different?  If so, can anyone give an example?

Also, is there an expectation that everything that is in this proposed Informational RFC has to be able to be provided in the short term?  I believe Hal's goal is that this be a document that would be applicable over a longer term and that some of the capabilities be provided soon and others more in the future.

Now, if we agree that some of the proposed capabilities would never be expected to be feasible, those should certainly be removed from the document.

Cory Beard
_______________________________________________
Ieprep mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep