Subject: RE: [Ieprep] Megaco (Correction)

From: "King, Kimberly S." <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:00:00 -0500

Opps!  I said

"I would hope that any new mechanism that SIPPING 
produces for the Resource Priority Header would be 
compatible with SIP-T."

Delete the word "Header" out of that line.  I was thinking of old drafts but
a header isn't the only way to provide the functionality requested in the
"Requirements for Resource Priority Mechanisms for the SIP".

Kimberly
_______________________________________________
Ieprep mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep