Subject: Research confirms cure/reversal, Alzheimers and Dementia

From: Advanced Alzheimer's research Worldwide <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:33:46 -0800

ScienceDaily
Your source for latest research

Permanent Cure For Alzheimer's and Dementia
January 19th, 2015

Yale research confirms a simple at home treatment that can reverse Alzheimer's and Dementia.

It's already been proven to cure and reverse Memory deteriorating agents.
http://www.dimentcureemergence.com/gyms/quinols/overstate/feloniously/preordained/budge.html

This research is so astounding that all curable steps can be done is the comfort of ones own home.
See video explanation -> http://www.dimentcureemergence.com/gyms/quinols/overstate/feloniously/preordained/budge.html

http://www.alz.org/alzheimers_disease_what_is_alzheimers.asp (http://www.alz.org/research/) The avocados on our tree will be ready to pick in the next 2-4 weeks. They still have to ripen and soften once picked, which usually takes about a week or so, but if picked too soon the only thing they will do is basically rot and never get soft.

All S.D. reports have backed sources and research. Presented material is accurate.
TurnnerJY-Center | 17502 Melody Cir | Dubuque | IA_52001 Se.tti.ngs (http://www.dimentcureemergence.com/racists/supervenes/flued/disciplinarians/snivel.php)

CDC: Flu Vaccine Is The Least Effective In A Decade

This answer is better because Arrays.stream has all the overloaded cases for primitive arrays. I.e Stream.of(new int[]{1,2,3}) will give you a Stream whereas Arrays.stream will give you back an IntStream which is probably what you want. So +1   user2336315 Jan 11 at 15:27
2
@Dima I was answering the "How do I create a Stream from an array" My example is simplified to fit in the comment (and yes in this case, I would call also of with the values), but you could have defined the int array before wanting to transform it in a Stream. That's why Arrays.stream is better for transforming an array into a Stream (and my example was to show the difference between both, which was not mentioned in the answer at first).   user2336315 Jan 11 at 16:03
2
@Dima I guess it's a matter of taste. I mean better in a sense Stream.of could give you some surprises (like when you call Arrays.asList with a primitive array and that people expect a List back) :-)   user2336315 Jan 11 at 16:11
3
Arrays.stream supports streaming a range of the array, which IntStream.of doesnt. In contrast, Stream.of is the better choice if you want a Stream of size 1   Holger Jan 11 at 16:46
2
@Dima The subrange overload of Arrays.stream is preferable to using Stream.of(array).skip(n).limit(m) because the former results in a SIZED stream whereas the latter does not. The reason is that limit(m) doesn't know whether the size is m or less than m, whereas Arrays.stream does range checks and knows the exact size of the stream.   Stuart Marks Jan 11 at 23:23