Subject: Re: The handling of Late Year Mid Term Vacancies

From: Dave Crocker <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 08:27:24 -0800

avri,

Thursday, October 31, 2002, 4:07:58 AM, you wrote:
avri> - A new nomcom takes several months to get up to speed and
avri> thus cannot be made to act in a timely manner.
...
avri> 1. The proposal that had design team rough consensus and is
avri> documented in the the current draft in 3.5 (soon to appear).
avri> In this solution the term of the nomcom is 15 months.

Given how tired a nomcom gets, this is a very painful resolution.  However
it is probably the most practical, given the latency in a new nomcom's
productivity, as you note.

d/
-- 
 Dave Crocker  <mailto:[email-masked]>
 TribalWise <http://www.tribalwise.com>
 t +1.408.246.8253; f +1.408.850.1850