Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-marf-not-spam-feedback-01.txt> (Email Feedback Report Type Value : not-spam) to Proposed Standard

From: SM <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:42:12 -0700

At 06:51 08-09-2011, The IESG wrote:
>The IESG has received a request from the Messaging Abuse Reporting Format
>WG (marf) to consider the following document:
>- 'Email Feedback Report Type Value : not-spam'
>   <draft-ietf-marf-not-spam-feedback-01.txt> as a Proposed Standard
>
>The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>[email-masked] mailing lists by 2011-09-22. Exceptionally, comments may be

I read the document.  As an editorial nit, Section 1.2 (terminology) 
seems superfluous given that there is only one optional 
requirement.  In the example in Section 3, I suggest referencing RFC 
5965 or pointing to the authoritative source.

Regards,
-sm