Subject: Re: ART Area Review for draft-ietf-calext-caldav-attachments-02

From: Julian Reschke <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:59:11 +0200

On 2017-05-14 16:23, Julian Reschke wrote:
> ...
Another thing that I just noticed: the spec uses Content-Disposition as 
request header field 
(<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-calext-caldav-attachments-02#section-3.4>), 
however it's currently only defined as response header field (RFC6266).

Best regards, Julian