From: Undetermined origin c/o LISTSERV administrator <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 19:38:28 +0200

Mail.System [email-masked]
        for [email-masked]
        id 11gtV8-00043K-00; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 18:38:14 +0100
X-Failed-Recipients: [email-masked]
@st.com
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Message-Id: <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 18:38:14 +0100

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its recipients. The
following address(es) failed:

  [email-masked]:
    unknown local-part "colinws" in domain "bristol.st.com"

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Date:         Thu, 28 Oct 1999 10:16:51 -0700
Reply-To: "Hattig, Myron" <[email-masked]>
Sender: IETF IP over 1394 Working Group <[email-masked]>
From: "Hattig, Myron" <[email-masked]>
Subject:      Re: IP address as a part of Config ROM
Comments: To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]

If you look back through the archives (from Dec 98-March 99, I think) this
was discussed and we did not think it was appropriate.

-myron

-----Original Message-----
From: Kannan. S [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 1999 3:26 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: IP address as a part of Config ROM

Hello,

    Would'nt it be helpful to have IP address(es) and the unicast FIFO
Address as a part of the unit directory mandated by the draft?. How
meaningful would it be to cause a bus reset in case of a change in IP
address ?( I understand that this issue goes beyond the spec ).

/Kannan.S