Subject: RE: Yost William: RE: [ipcdn] Re: Bit ordering for docsQosParamSe tRequestPolicy in QOS-MIB

From: Yost William <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 08:34:40 -0500

I vote 2)

--- William H. Yost, Thomson Consumer Electronics: (317) 587-4816 ---   
. Home of RCA, Proscan, GE electronics .

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael W. Patrick [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2000 9:36 PM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Yost William: RE: [ipcdn] Re: Bit ordering for
docsQosParamSetRequestPolicy in QOS-MIB

OK, can I have a straw poll of Docsis vendors please?

Do you vote 

1) Keep DocsQosParamSetRequestPolicy as in QOS MIB -02, requiring
   a bit swap and shift when reporting the value of the 
   24.16 Request/Transmission Policy parameter?

2) Change docsQosParamSetRequestPolicy in a QOS MIB -03 to be an INTEGER
   matching the binary value of parameter 24.16?

-mike

------- Forwarded Message

---

From: "Bob Himlin" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 14:55:11 -0700

Seconded.

Bob Himlin, TurboNet Communications
15110 Avenue of Science
San Diego, CA 92128-3405
 [email-masked]

-----Original Message-----
From:	[email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Yost
William
Sent:	Monday, May 15, 2000 6:35 AM
To:	[email-masked]
Subject:	RE: Yost William: RE: [ipcdn] Re: Bit ordering for
docsQosParamSetRequestPolicy in  QOS-MIB

I vote 2)

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael W. Patrick [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2000 9:36 PM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Yost William: RE: [ipcdn] Re: Bit ordering for

Do you vote

-mike