Subject: [ipcdn] review of draft-ietf-ipcdn-device-mibv2-04.txt - use of InetPortN umber

From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:20:12 +0100

You now use InetPortNumber for ports.
That is in principle good, but since that TC has
SYNTAX Unsigned32 (0..65535) as underlying datatype.

Your RFC2669 has SYNTAX Integer32 (0..65535) as 
datatype. So by switching to InetPortNumber you
cause a change on the wire.

That is not allowed. You'd need to deprecate the
old objects and create new ones for such a change
to be legal according to the SMI rules.

Thanks,
Bert 
_______________________________________________
IPCDN mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn