Subject: RE: [ipcdn] Signaling MIB - Draft 3 - Last Call - pktcSigDevToneType (Issue 3)

From: "David De Reu" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:24:08 +0100

> Upon review of ITU spec, supplement 2, and ES 201 970, Motorola
> further disagrees with the deletion of the following additional items
> from the pktcSigDevToneType object:
>
> alertingSignal(17), 
> specialDial(18), 
> specialInfo(19), 
> release(20), 
> congestion(21) 

Unfortunately, I have not been able to locate ES 201 970. However, you
may want to make sure that the distinction between

(1) special dial tone and stutter dial tone, and

(2) congestion tone and reorder tone

is unambiguous. As far as I can see, they are in many cases (but not
always) used as synomyms.

> To ensure these objects can also be signaled, Motorola is initiating a
> proposal to modify TS 909-101 part 4, appendix B.4 to include NCS line
> codes and other parameters.

This is an opportunity to remove any possible confusion, of course.

Thanks,

David

_____________________________________________________
David De Reu
tComLabs
Stapelplein 70/004 - 9000 Ghent - Belgium
Tel: +32 9 269 22 91 - Fax: +32 9 329 31 74
www.tComLabs.com
_____________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
IPCDN mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn