Subject: RE: [ipcdn] Editorial Changes - NCS MIB

From: Beacham Gordon-CGB005 <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:36:04 -0800

Agreed. Thanks for your comments. Gordon

-----Original Message-----
From: David De Reu [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:50 PM
To: IPCDN Mailing List; [email-masked]; Beacham Gordon-CGB005
Subject: RE: [ipcdn] Editorial Changes - NCS MIB

> > 3. Change pktcSigNotification OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { pktcSigMib 0 } to:
> >    pktcSigNotification OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { pktcSigMib 2 }
>
> Recommend keeping the notification as it is per Appendix D
> of the draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-02.txt.

Good point indeed. We currently have

  pktcSigNotification OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { pktcSigMib 0 }
  pktcSigMibObjects   OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { pktcSigMib 1 }
  pktcSigConformance  OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { pktcSigMib 3 }

When we follow the OID layout suggested in appendix D of
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-02
.txt>, which is

  xxxMIB
  |
  +-- xxxNotifications(0)
  +-- xxxObjects(1)
  +-- xxxConformance(2)
      |
      +-- xxxCompliances(1)
      +-- xxxGroups(2)

then I suggest instead redefining pktcSigConformance as

  pktcSigConformance  OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { pktcSigMib 2 }

Thanks,

Regards,

David

_____________________________________________________
David De Reu
tComLabs
Stapelplein 70/004 - 9000 Ghent - Belgium
Tel: +32 9 269 22 91 - Fax: +32 9 329 31 74
www.tComLabs.com
_____________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
IPCDN mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn