Subject: IPFC Mandatory Requirements

From: Murali Rajagopal <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 12:42:49 -0800

Folks:

Please ignore my previous email on FARP requirements.
The wording on FARP-REQ being mandatory was not what I wanted to say in my
email. 
It had to do with what is implied when one says that they are "IPFC FARP
compliant".

I believe the right answer is that you are still compliant if you can reply
to a FARP-REQ without having the ability to send out a FARP-REQ.

My apologies for any confusion.

-Murali