Subject: two points about draft-ietf-mobileip-ipv6-10.txt

From: Francis Dupont <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2000 00:47:11 +0100

The next I-D will show in some cases two destination
option headers, one just before AH/SP, one just after
but the current base specs (RFC 2460) don't really allow this
(ie. this must be accepted but should not be sent).

The second point is about sub-option alignment constraints:
what error type/code should be used if an alignment constraint
is not followed.

Regards

[email-masked]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [email-masked]
--------------------------------------------------------------------