Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-01.txt

From: "Jeyanath Minto J - CTD, Chennai." <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 13:09:50 +0530

hi john,
   what do u meant say? Multihomed host is beyond this document? 
    
   is Running the routing protocol or necessary configuration not a minimum
requirement of multihomed host?

  One more Question regarding IPv6 mib ?
       
      RFCs and the Draft are follow contractible apporaches. 
      Node requirement draft support RFCs but not the drafts. 
      is there any reason for not following the drafts?. 

Minto    

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 11:30 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-01.txt

Hi Minto,

This does not sound like a minimum requirement for IPv6 nodes - are you
proposing that IPv6 thermometer would need multihoming?  The current
document does not state this is the maximum functionality for an IPv6
node, but it is much more meant to be a minimum set of fucntionality.

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Jeyanath Minto J - CTD, Chennai.
> [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: 22 December, 2002 17:15
> To: Loughney John (NRC/Helsinki)
> Subject: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-01.txt
> 
> 
> 
> hi John Loughney,
> 
>  why this draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-01 doesnt cover 
> anything related
> to multihomed host. 
>  multihomed host should run the routing protocol or it needs some
> configuration.  Am I right ? 
>  dont we need to specify this ?   
>  
> Minto 
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [email-masked]
--------------------------------------------------------------------