Subject: RE: RFC 3513 on Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Addressing Architecture

From: "Rasheeduddin, Tariq" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 12:44:11 -0600

Does anyone know if there any standard or RFC available to define the size of 
prefix length which will be acceptable by upstream in the absense of TLA/NLA 
boundaries? For example, if I have a /32 from ARIN directly then other service 
provider or my upstream should accept it?

Tariq

From: [email-masked]
[mailto:[email-masked]]On Behalf Of Margaret Wasserman
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 8:07 AM
To: Eliot Lear
Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
Subject: Re: RFC 3513 on Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Addressing
Architecture

At 01:53 PM 4/12/2003 -0700, Eliot Lear wrote:
>This has to be the most ironic timing ever.  See the WG minutes as to why.

Perhaps.  But, it is still great to see this come out as an RFC,
since it makes so many important improvements over the previous
RFC (removal of the TLA/SLA boundaries, etc.).

Thanks, Bob!

Margaret

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [email-masked]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [email-masked]
--------------------------------------------------------------------