Subject: IPP> IPP protocol document...

From: "Turner, Randy" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 11:50:22 -0800

By the way, I noticed in the current protocol draft, that we have
a statement that says an implementation MUST support
digest authentication in HTTP. In my opinion this wording
would be better if we used SHOULD, since we have a goal
for implementers to have secure and non-secure implementations.
Also, digest (and basic auth for that matter) are not REQUIRED
in order to HTTP 1.1 "compliant" (at least thats the way I 
understand it...).

Randy