Subject: Re: FW: <draft-ietf-ipr-technology-rights-06.txt>

From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 11:16:59 -0400

In message <[email-masked]>, Pekka Savola 
writes:
>On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Scott W Brim wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 05:47:39PM +0200, Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote:
>> > Scott Bradner wrote:
>> > > note that I did have the latter in one revision of the ID but
>> > > removed it when it was ponted out that it would be a change in
>> > > process which these documents are not supposed to do - but I
>> > > think teh IESG could decide (on their own) to add such a
>> > > call for IPR without violating rfc 2026
>> > 
>> > Why don't we decide whether we like Pekka's draft on that question?
>> 
>> Is that in-charter?
>
>Difficult to say, but if it gives you warm feelings, ipr-template isn't 
>either -- and bam, suddenly it's a working group draft :-)

With the consent of the AD.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg