Subject: Re: [IPSECKEY] new draft revision (00b)

From: Sam Weiler <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:30:15 -0400 (EDT)

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003 [email-masked] wrote:

> >   2) byte to distinguish type.
> >      FQDN)   wire-encode item
> >      IPv4)   4 bytes
> >      IPv6)   16 bytes
> 
> 	Go with 2.  This is a bicycle shed.

It sounds like we have rough consensus on the gateway format.  If I've
missed something vital, please speak up.  Otherwise, I suggest that
Micheal incorporate the second option into the draft. 

As always, read the draft, send comments to the list or the editor.

-- Sam

-
This is the [email-masked] list.
Email to [email-masked] to be removed.