Subject: RE: [IPTEL] TRIP-GW

From: Jonathan Rosenberg <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 18:48:50 -0400

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kiarash Bodouhi [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:24 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [IPTEL] TRIP-GW
> 
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Any comments on changing the transport protocol from TCP to UDP for
> TRIP-GW? It has got major advantages for this specific use.

That change makes no sense. It has none of the benefits you assign to it.
The timescales of data changes within TRIP are much larger than any
timescales related to UDP vs. TCP, so your arguments are all moot. Let us
move on to real issues.

We now have an additional proposal for the gateway registration problem:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zhao-iptel-gwloc-slp-00.txt

Please take a look, and let us quickly come to an agreement on direction.

-Jonathan R.

---
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                72 Eagle Rock Ave.
Chief Scientist                             First Floor
dynamicsoft                                 East Hanover, NJ 07936
[email-masked]                     FAX:   (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net                      PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com

_______________________________________________
IPTEL mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.bell-labs.com/mailman/listinfo/iptel