Subject: rfc6164 vs rfc4291 question

From: Toerless Eckert <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:23:28 +0200

Why if rfc6164 not tracked as an update to rfc4291 given how it explicitly refers
to not complying to RFC4291 specification (eg: non /64 interface identifiers) ?

I also think to remember that one of the co-authors of rfc4291 said during praue
6man that documents that do this should be tracked as updates of rfc4291.

Cheers
    Toerless