Subject: [jose] #21: JWK and JWKSet do not have media types registered

From: "jose issue tracker" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 20:51:32 -0000

#21: JWK and JWKSet do not have media types registered

 Media types are not registered for JWK and JWKSet.  Suggested values are:

 * JWK -- "application/jwk+json"
 * JWKSet -- "application/jwk-set+json"

-- 
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:               |      Owner:  draft-ietf-jose-json-web-
  [email-masked]     |  [email-masked]
     Type:  enhancement  |     Status:  new
 Priority:  minor        |  Milestone:
Component:  json-web-    |    Version:
  key                    |   Keywords:
 Severity:  Active WG    |
  Document               |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <https://grenache.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/21>
jose <http://tools.ietf.org/jose/>

---

From: Richard Barnes <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 18:52:30 -0400

+1

On Wednesday, May 22, 2013, jose issue tracker wrote:

>   [email-masked] <javascript:;>     |  [email-masked]<javascript:;>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [email-masked] <javascript:;>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>

---

From: Mike Jones <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 22:53:39 +0000

Fine with me

From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Richard Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 3:53 PM
To: jose issue tracker
Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [jose] #21: JWK and JWKSet do not have media types registered

+1

  [email-masked]<javascript:;>     |  [email-masked]<javascript:;>

_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email-masked]<javascript:;>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

---

From: John Bradley <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 18:56:45 -0400

+1

On 2013-05-22, at 6:53 PM, Mike Jones <[email-masked]> wrote:

> [email-masked]
> [email-masked]

---

From: Nat Sakimura <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 08:23:41 +0900

+1

=nat via iPhone

---

From: "Manger, James H" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:16:19 +1000

Do we need a media type for a single JWK? I though URIs in JOSE were always expected to result in a set of keys (there might only be 1 key in a set, of course).

I would prefer one media type: applications/keys+json

--
James Manger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of
> jose issue tracker
> Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2013 6:52 AM
> To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: [jose] #21: JWK and JWKSet do not have media types registered
>

---

From: "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:58:43 +0000

> I would prefer one media type: applications/keys+json

Having a media type for a single key would help with wrapped keys:

{
  "alg":"PBES2-A256KW+HS256",
  "enc":"A256-GCM",
  "cty":"application/jwk+json"
}

...

- m&m

Matt Miller < [email-masked] >
Cisco Systems, Inc.

---

From: Richard Barnes <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 14:12:46 -0400

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Matt Miller (mamille2)
<[email-masked]>wrote:

> > Do we need a media type for a single JWK? I though URIs in JOSE were
> always expected to result in a set of keys (there might only be 1 key in a
> set, of course).
> >

This is exactly what I was going to say.
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-jose-key-wrapping-01#section-2>

---

From: "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 18:26:28 +0000

> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-jose-key-wrapping-01#section-2>

Or, you know, < http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-miller-jose-jwe-protected-jwk.html > (-:

- m&m