Subject: [L2tpext] draft-mkonstan-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-00

From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 08:25:29 +0000

Some review comments:

1) I am not sure the use of explaining port-level/single-stack/multi-stack is sensible or relevant, they should eb used as examples. It's enough to say that each logical interface (whatever it may be) is uniquely identified by an ipv6 address.
2) "The L2TPv3 encapsulating router identifies each L2TPv3 tunnel endpoint by a distinct /128 address" -> we should also describe the any cast behaviour and the fact the tunnel is identified by a unique src/dst address combination
3) General:
There's no mention of fragmentation and reassembly requirements;
OAM should be described better with reference to the OAM draft in L2VPN