Subject: RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-ppvpn-terminology-04.txt]

From: "Hamid Ould-Brahim" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 13:55:20 -0400

Tom,

[clipped]...

> 
> 	I too supported the document, as it is a good idea 
> to keep track of the termonolgy. However, it seems more 
> appropriate to push these into the framework rather 
> than being stand-alone.  If we come up with more acronyms 
> after the framework is published we can always push out a 
> supplemental document, or define them in their respective
> drafts which seems to be how things have been done in the
> past in other WGs.
> 

That would be a good option as well to consider.

Hamid.