Subject: Re: Poll to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-03 as a L3VPN WG document

From: Ben Niven-Jenkins <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 18:00:41 +0100

Colleagues,

We have rough consensus to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-03 as a L3VPN WG document, can the authors please re-submit it as draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-00.

There were some comments made during the WG adoption poll that indicated that not all WG members agreed with the scope currently covered by draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-03. I discussed this with our ADs at IETF81 and would like to remind folks that post-WG adoption, change control for the draft is now controlled by the WG (and no longer with the individual authors) and so the scope of the document as well as its contents can be modified inline with the rough consensus of the WG.

Ben

P.S. My apologies it has taken me ~2.5 months to follow-up on this, it is entirely my fault that it fell off my radar.

On 30 Apr 2011, at 10:01, Ben Niven-Jenkins wrote:

> Colleagues,
> 
> This e-mail is to start a poll on whether the L3VPN WG should adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-03.txt as a L3VPN WG document.
> 
> Please indicate your support or otherwise by responding to this message (with yes/support or no/do not support) or e-mailing the WG chairs privately.
> 
> If you do not support the adoption of the document it would be useful if you could also state the reason for your objection.
> 
> Please send your responses by midnight August 15th May PDT.
> 
> FYI Eric has outlined his view on the need for this document on the mailing list previously which you can read here:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn/current/msg02901.html
> 
> Thanks
> Ben
>