Subject: Re: Poll to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document?

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:45:04 +0000

Support.

Ciaoo,

William

<a href="http://ipv6.he.net/certification/scoresheet.php?pass_name=WilliamZayas " target="_blank"><img src="http://ipv6.he.net/certification/create_badge.php?pass_name=WilliamZayas &badge=1" width=128 height=128 border=0 alt="IPv6 Certification Badge for WilliamZayas "></img></a>
-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Qiu [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 04:21 PM
To: 'Ben Niven-Jenkins', 'L3VPN WG mailing list'
Subject: RE: Poll to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a	L3VPN	WG	document?

SupportThanks,Ray-----Original Message-----From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Ben Niven-JenkinsSent: dinsdag 30 augustus 2011 17:58To: L3VPN WG mailing listSubject: Poll to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document?L3VPNers,We have a milestone in our charter to "Submit S-PMSI A-D route Wildcard selection specification to IESG as PS".Previously we had two individual drafts (draft-rekhter-mvpn-wildcard-spmsi & draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wildcards) that addressed this topic. The authors of those drafts have now produced a single combined draft: draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00This e-mail is to start a poll on whether the L3VPN WG should adopt the new combined draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document.Please indicate your support or otherwise by responding to this message (with yes/support or no/do not support) or by e-mailing the WG chairs privately.If you do not support the adoption of the document it would be useful if you could also state the reason for your objection.Please send your responses by midnight 13th September PT.ThanksBen