Subject: Re: Poll to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document?

From: Ben Niven-Jenkins <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:14:40 +0100

Colleagues,

We have consesnus to adopt draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document, can the authors please re-submit it as draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00.

Thanks
Ben

On 30 Aug 2011, at 16:58, Ben Niven-Jenkins wrote:

> L3VPNers,
> 
> We have a milestone in our charter to "Submit S-PMSI A-D route Wildcard selection specification to IESG as PS".
> 
> Previously we had two individual drafts (draft-rekhter-mvpn-wildcard-spmsi & draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wildcards) that addressed this topic. The authors of those drafts have now produced a single combined draft: draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00
> 
> This e-mail is to start a poll on whether the L3VPN WG should adopt the new combined draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-wldcds-cmbind-00 as a L3VPN WG document.
> 
> Please indicate your support or otherwise by responding to this message (with yes/support or no/do not support) or by e-mailing the WG chairs privately.
> 
> If you do not support the adoption of the document it would be useful if you could also state the reason for your objection.
> 
> Please send your responses by midnight 13th September PT.
> 
> Thanks
> Ben