From N.Leymann@telekom.de Mon Dec 3 07:29:45 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E78321F886C for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 07:29:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.649 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qQgWekhmjRXw for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 07:29:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from tcmail13.telekom.de (tcmail13.telekom.de [80.149.113.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BD921F885B for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 07:29:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from he113414.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.65.80]) by tcmail11.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 03 Dec 2012 16:29:41 +0100 Received: from HE111543.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.90.96]) by HE113414.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([2002:7cd:4150::7cd:4150]) with mapi; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 16:29:41 +0100 From: To: , Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 16:29:40 +0100 Subject: AW: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Index: AQHNzhH5EQMWRADRq0a2aXmDkECtCpgHOaTw Message-ID: <9762ACF04FA26B4388476841256BDE02011695B6C352@HE111543.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> References: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> In-Reply-To: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Accept-Language: de-DE Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:29:45 -0000 Support (as co-author). Nic -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von = thomas.morin@orange.com Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. November 2012 10:15 An: l3vpn@ietf.org Betreff: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling= -01 Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 [1]. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until December 13th. Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin & Thomas l3vpn chairs [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-= 01 ___________________________________________________________________________= ______________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confiden= tielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu= ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages el= ectroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete al= tere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged inf= ormation that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and dele= te this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for message= s that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From paul.hitchen@bt.com Tue Dec 4 03:35:31 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FDD21F8800 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 03:35:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FNmmSAJzduLp for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 03:35:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpe1.intersmtp.com (smtp62.intersmtp.com [62.239.224.235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D2E21F87F6 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 03:35:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from EVMHT63-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net (10.36.3.100) by RDW083A006ED62.smtp-e2.hygiene.service (10.187.98.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.279.1; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 11:35:38 +0000 Received: from EMV65-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net ([169.254.1.220]) by EVMHT63-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net ([10.36.3.100]) with mapi; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 11:35:28 +0000 From: To: Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 11:35:27 +0000 Subject: RE: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Index: AQHNzhH5EQMWRADRq0a2aXmDkECtCpgIifQw Message-ID: <4BF3B24B46BEA246BB7D832A32CF7061356E920DC0@EMV65-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net> References: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> In-Reply-To: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 11:35:31 -0000 SGkuDQoNCkkgc3VwcG9ydCBhcyBhIGNvLWF1dGhvci4NCg0KUmVnYXJkaW5nIElQUiwgbm90IGF3 YXJlIG9mIGFueSByZWxldmFudCBJUFIuDQoNCnJlZ2FyZHMNCg0KUGF1bCBIaXRjaGVuIA0KDQot LS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogbDN2cG4tYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZyBb bWFpbHRvOmwzdnBuLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiB0aG9tYXMubW9yaW5A b3JhbmdlLmNvbQ0KU2VudDogMjkgTm92ZW1iZXIgMjAxMiAwOToxNQ0KVG86IGwzdnBuQGlldGYu b3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBQb2xsIGZvciBhZG9wdGlvbjogZHJhZnQtd2lqbmFuZHMtbDN2cG4tbWxk cC12cmYtaW4tYmFuZC1zaWduYWxpbmctMDENCg0KSGVsbG8gd29ya2luZyBncm91cCwNCg0KVGhp cyBlbWFpbCBzdGFydHMgYSB0d28td2VlayBwb2xsIG9uIGFkb3B0aW5nDQpkcmFmdC13aWpuYW5k cy1sM3Zwbi1tbGRwLXZyZi1pbi1iYW5kLXNpZ25hbGluZy0wMSBbMV0uDQoNClBsZWFzZSBzZW5k IGNvbW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGFuZCBzdGF0ZSBpZiB5b3Ugc3VwcG9ydCBhZG9wdGlvbiBv ciBub3QgKGluIHRoZSBsYXRlciBjYXNlLCBwbGVhc2UgYWxzbyBzdGF0ZSB0aGUgcmVhc29ucyku DQoNClRoaXMgcG9sbCBydW5zIHVudGlsIERlY2VtYmVyIDEzdGguDQoNCg0KQ29pbmNpZGVudGFs bHksIHdlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgYXBw bGllcyB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0LCB0byBlbnN1cmUgdGhhdCBJUFIgaGFzIGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2Vk IGluIGNvbXBsaWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyAoc2VlIFJGQ3MgMzk3OSwgNDg3OSwg MzY2OSBhbmQgNTM3OCBmb3IgbW9yZSBkZXRhaWxzKS4NCg0KSWYgeW91IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQgYXMg YSBkb2N1bWVudCBhdXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IgcGxlYXNlIHJlc3BvbmQgdG8gdGhpcyBl bWFpbCB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSByZWxldmFudCBJUFIuIFRo ZSBkcmFmdCB3aWxsIG5vdCBiZSBhZG9wdGVkIHVudGlsIGEgcmVzcG9uc2UgaGFzIGJlZW4gcmVj ZWl2ZWQgZnJvbSBlYWNoIGF1dGhvciBhbmQgY29udHJpYnV0b3IuDQoNCklmIHlvdSBhcmUgb24g dGhlIEwzVlBOIFdHIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdCBidXQgYXJlIG5vdCBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYW4gYXV0aG9y IG9yIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLCB0aGVuIHBsZWFzZSBleHBsaWNpdGx5IHJlc3BvbmQgb25seSBpZiB5 b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCBoYXMgbm90IHlldCBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBp biBjb25mb3JtYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgcnVsZXMuDQoNClRoYW5rIHlvdSwNCg0KTWFydGluICYg VGhvbWFzDQpsM3ZwbiBjaGFpcnMNCg0KWzFdDQpodHRwOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9k cmFmdC13aWpuYW5kcy1sM3Zwbi1tbGRwLXZyZi1pbi1iYW5kLXNpZ25hbGluZy0wMQ0KX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f Xw0KDQpDZSBtZXNzYWdlIGV0IHNlcyBwaWVjZXMgam9pbnRlcyBwZXV2ZW50IGNvbnRlbmlyIGRl cyBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbnMgY29uZmlkZW50aWVsbGVzIG91IHByaXZpbGVnaWVlcyBldCBuZSBkb2l2 ZW50IGRvbmMgcGFzIGV0cmUgZGlmZnVzZXMsIGV4cGxvaXRlcyBvdSBjb3BpZXMgc2FucyBhdXRv cmlzYXRpb24uIFNpIHZvdXMgYXZleiByZWN1IGNlIG1lc3NhZ2UgcGFyIGVycmV1ciwgdmV1aWxs ZXogbGUgc2lnbmFsZXIgYSBsJ2V4cGVkaXRldXIgZXQgbGUgZGV0cnVpcmUgYWluc2kgcXVlIGxl cyBwaWVjZXMgam9pbnRlcy4gTGVzIG1lc3NhZ2VzIGVsZWN0cm9uaXF1ZXMgZXRhbnQgc3VzY2Vw dGlibGVzIGQnYWx0ZXJhdGlvbiwgRnJhbmNlIFRlbGVjb20gLSBPcmFuZ2UgZGVjbGluZSB0b3V0 ZSByZXNwb25zYWJpbGl0ZSBzaSBjZSBtZXNzYWdlIGEgZXRlIGFsdGVyZSwgZGVmb3JtZSBvdSBm YWxzaWZpZS4gTWVyY2kuDQoNClRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBhbmQgaXRzIGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzIG1heSBj b250YWluIGNvbmZpZGVudGlhbCBvciBwcml2aWxlZ2VkIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIHRoYXQgbWF5IGJl IHByb3RlY3RlZCBieSBsYXc7IHRoZXkgc2hvdWxkIG5vdCBiZSBkaXN0cmlidXRlZCwgdXNlZCBv ciBjb3BpZWQgd2l0aG91dCBhdXRob3Jpc2F0aW9uLg0KSWYgeW91IGhhdmUgcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhp cyBlbWFpbCBpbiBlcnJvciwgcGxlYXNlIG5vdGlmeSB0aGUgc2VuZGVyIGFuZCBkZWxldGUgdGhp cyBtZXNzYWdlIGFuZCBpdHMgYXR0YWNobWVudHMuDQpBcyBlbWFpbHMgbWF5IGJlIGFsdGVyZWQs IEZyYW5jZSBUZWxlY29tIC0gT3JhbmdlIGlzIG5vdCBsaWFibGUgZm9yIG1lc3NhZ2VzIHRoYXQg aGF2ZSBiZWVuIG1vZGlmaWVkLCBjaGFuZ2VkIG9yIGZhbHNpZmllZC4NClRoYW5rIHlvdS4NCg0K From william.zayas@fibercrossing.net Tue Dec 4 05:28:59 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D962B21F85C7 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 05:28:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UbLRc5LB2Mro for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 05:28:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from atl4mhob05.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob05.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.43]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0558821F85B2 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 05:28:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by atl4mhob05.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB4DSvNX016631 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 08:28:57 -0500 Received: (qmail 26340 invoked by uid 0); 4 Dec 2012 13:28:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO your3b7c6e1c8e) (william.zayas@fibercrossing.net@66.7.145.194) by 0 with ESMTPA; 4 Dec 2012 13:28:57 -0000 Message-ID: From: "William Zayas" To: "Stig Venaas" , References: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <50B7A648.1090007@venaas.com> Subject: Re: Poll for adoption:draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 08:29:00 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: William Zayas List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:29:00 -0000 Support, Cheers, Bill- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stig Venaas" To: Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 1:15 PM Subject: Re: Poll for adoption:draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 > On 11/29/2012 1:14 AM, thomas.morin@orange.com wrote: >> Hello working group, >> >> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >> draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 [1]. >> >> Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or >> not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > > Support, > > Stig > >> This poll runs until December 13th. >> >> >> Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that >> applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in >> compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 >> and 5378 for more details). >> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to >> this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft >> will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author >> and contributor. >> >> If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author >> or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of >> any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Martin & Thomas >> l3vpn chairs >> >> [1] >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 >> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >> >> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations >> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc >> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez >> recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler >> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages >> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, >> France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete >> altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >> >> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged >> information that may be protected by law; >> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and >> delete this message and its attachments. >> As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for >> messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. >> Thank you. >> > > From martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com Tue Dec 4 06:29:41 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46CB21F8A8B for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 06:29:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -109.649 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OPAPdDmyifgP for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 06:29:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr (smail2.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B03521F8AB4 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 06:29:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.62]) by smail2.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id qB4ETCWm008446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:29:37 +0100 Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.74) by FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (135.120.45.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:29:30 +0100 Received: from [172.27.205.205] (135.239.27.12) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.74) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:29:30 +0100 Message-ID: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:29:29 +0100 From: Martin Vigoureux Organization: Alcatel-Lucent User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: L3VPN Subject: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.12] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.80 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:29:41 -0000 Hello Working Group, This e-mail starts a two-week poll on adopting http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all-00 as WG document This work results from a merge of previous drafts on the topic. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until December 18th. Note that, Thomas being a co-author on this draft, I'll judge consensus to adopt the document. Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin (as L3VPN co-chair) From yakov@juniper.net Tue Dec 4 06:47:07 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B88A21F86AA for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 06:47:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.407 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.192, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4IOBZ0+YOAs5 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 06:47:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod7og105.obsmtp.com (exprod7og105.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.163]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D7421F86A1 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 06:47:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob105.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUL4M6MpSxN45sfQQyHO9mEjUhzcUmr+L@postini.com; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 06:47:06 PST Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 06:39:18 -0800 Received: from juniper.net (sapphire.juniper.net [172.17.28.108]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id qB4EdH313503; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 06:39:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yakov@juniper.net) Message-ID: <201212041439.qB4EdH313503@magenta.juniper.net> To: Martin Vigoureux Subject: Re: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all In-Reply-To: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> References: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> X-MH-In-Reply-To: Martin Vigoureux message dated "Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:29:29 +0100." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <72921.1354631957.1@juniper.net> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 06:39:17 -0800 From: Yakov Rekhter Cc: L3VPN X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:47:07 -0000 Martin, > Hello Working Group, > > This e-mail starts a two-week poll on adopting > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all-00 > as WG document > > This work results from a merge of previous drafts on the topic. > > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > > This poll runs until December 18th. > > Note that, Thomas being a co-author on this draft, I'll judge consensus > to adopt the document. > > Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 > and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft > will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author > and contributor. Replying as a co-author, I am not aware of any relevant IPR. Yakov. From jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com Tue Dec 4 09:16:03 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9403221F8C6A for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:16:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Meecw+DI8UDR for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:16:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from imr3.ericy.com (imr3.ericy.com [198.24.6.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0775F21F8C58 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:16:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from eusaamw0712.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.181]) by imr3.ericy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qB4HEp4L010862 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 4 Dec 2012 11:15:57 -0600 Received: from EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se (147.117.188.93) by eusaamw0712.eamcs.ericsson.se (147.117.20.181) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.279.1; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 12:15:55 -0500 Received: from EUSAAMB109.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.126]) by EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.93]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 12:15:55 -0500 From: Jeff Tantsura To: Martin Vigoureux , L3VPN Subject: RE: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Thread-Index: AQHN0ivQs1h2bV4QhEWiWZoQ7/fHzpgI4QKA Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 17:15:55 +0000 Message-ID: <60DEDD93F5E54B4AB55647B8B6C748390CB47C@eusaamb109.ericsson.se> References: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.135] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:16:03 -0000 Yes/support -----Original Message----- From: l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of M= artin Vigoureux Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 6:29 AM To: L3VPN Subject: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Hello Working Group, This e-mail starts a two-week poll on adopting http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all-00 as WG document This work results from a merge of previous drafts on the topic. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (= in the later case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until December 18th. Note that, Thomas being a co-author on this draft, I'll judge consensus to = adopt the document. Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies t= o this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF= IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to thi= s email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will no= t be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contri= butor. If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author or = contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IP= R that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin (as L3VPN co-chair) From wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com Tue Dec 4 12:49:05 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC1821F8A9B for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 12:49:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.948 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.299, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zvljYI9QNHbt for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 12:49:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr (smail2.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D9921F8A94 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 12:49:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.62]) by smail2.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id qB4KlaRs022599 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:49:01 +0100 Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.40]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.62]) with mapi; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:48:59 +0100 From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" To: "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN)" , L3VPN Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:48:56 +0100 Subject: Re: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Thread-Index: Ac3SYMisScuh7KSTT1ucHyuohcbi1Q== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010 acceptlanguage: nl-NL, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.80 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:49:06 -0000 Not aware of IPR On 04/12/12 15:29, "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN)" wrote: >Hello Working Group, > >This e-mail starts a two-week poll on adopting >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all-00 >as WG document > >This work results from a merge of previous drafts on the topic. > >Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or >not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > >This poll runs until December 18th. > >Note that, Thomas being a co-author on this draft, I'll judge consensus >to adopt the document. > >Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that >applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in >compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 >and 5378 for more details). > >If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to >this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft >will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author >and contributor. > >If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author >or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of >any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > >Thank you, > >Martin (as L3VPN co-chair) From thomas.morin@orange.com Tue Dec 4 13:34:40 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53AE221F8BB4 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 13:34:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.148 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8btgLlS-hfOo for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 13:34:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD49D21F8AE4 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 13:34:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.3]) by omfedm11.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 6F1A93B47E3 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 22:34:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.186]) by omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 585F54C063 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 22:34:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::cc7e:e40b:42ef:164e]) by PEXCVZYH01.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 22:34:36 +0100 From: To: "l3vpn@ietf.org" Subject: Re: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Thread-Index: AQHN0ivPutTvR1MtSk6OuclHnxKDfJgJGS+A Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:34:36 +0000 Message-ID: <26310_1354656877_50BE6C6D_26310_10884_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071200B9@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 x-originating-ip: [10.197.38.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.12.4.170316 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:34:40 -0000 SSdtIG5vdCBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSLCBhbmQgYXMgYSBjby1hdXRob3IgZG8gc3VwcG9ydCBh ZG9wdGlvbiBvZiB0aGUgZG9jLg0KDQotVGhvbWFzDQoNCk1hcnRpbiBWaWdvdXJldXg6DQo+IEhl bGxvIFdvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXAsDQo+DQo+IFRoaXMgZS1tYWlsIHN0YXJ0cyBhIHR3by13ZWVrIHBv bGwgb24gYWRvcHRpbmcNCj4gaHR0cDovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtcm9zZW4t bDN2cG4tbXZwbi1leHRyYW5ldC1hbGwtMDANCj4gYXMgV0cgZG9jdW1lbnQNCj4NCj4gVGhpcyB3 b3JrIHJlc3VsdHMgZnJvbSBhIG1lcmdlIG9mIHByZXZpb3VzIGRyYWZ0cyBvbiB0aGUgdG9waWMu DQo+DQo+IFBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGFuZCBzdGF0ZSBpZiB5b3Ug c3VwcG9ydCBhZG9wdGlvbiBvcg0KPiBub3QgKGluIHRoZSBsYXRlciBjYXNlLCBwbGVhc2UgYWxz byBzdGF0ZSB0aGUgcmVhc29ucykuDQo+DQo+IFRoaXMgcG9sbCBydW5zIHVudGlsIERlY2VtYmVy IDE4dGguDQo+DQo+IE5vdGUgdGhhdCwgVGhvbWFzIGJlaW5nIGEgY28tYXV0aG9yIG9uIHRoaXMg ZHJhZnQsIEknbGwganVkZ2UgDQo+IGNvbnNlbnN1cyB0byBhZG9wdCB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQuDQo+ DQo+IENvaW5jaWRlbnRhbGx5LCB3ZSBhcmUgYWxzbyBwb2xsaW5nIGZvciBrbm93bGVkZ2Ugb2Yg YW55IElQUiB0aGF0DQo+IGFwcGxpZXMgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdCwgdG8gZW5zdXJlIHRoYXQgSVBS IGhhcyBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbg0KPiBjb21wbGlhbmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBJUFIgcnVsZXMg KHNlZSBSRkNzIDM5NzksIDQ4NzksIDM2NjkNCj4gYW5kIDUzNzggZm9yIG1vcmUgZGV0YWlscyku DQo+DQo+IElmIHlvdSBhcmUgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGEgZG9jdW1lbnQgYXV0aG9yIG9yIGNvbnRyaWJ1 dG9yIHBsZWFzZSByZXNwb25kIHRvDQo+IHRoaXMgZW1haWwgd2hldGhlciBvciBub3QgeW91IGFy ZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgcmVsZXZhbnQgSVBSLiBUaGUgZHJhZnQNCj4gd2lsbCBub3QgYmUgYWRv cHRlZCB1bnRpbCBhIHJlc3BvbnNlIGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlY2VpdmVkIGZyb20gZWFjaCBhdXRob3IN Cj4gYW5kIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLg0KPg0KPiBJZiB5b3UgYXJlIG9uIHRoZSBMM1ZQTiBXRyBtYWls aW5nIGxpc3QgYnV0IGFyZSBub3QgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGFuIGF1dGhvcg0KPiBvciBjb250cmlidXRv ciwgdGhlbiBwbGVhc2UgZXhwbGljaXRseSByZXNwb25kIG9ubHkgaWYgeW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBv Zg0KPiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgaGFzIG5vdCB5ZXQgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29uZm9ybWFu Y2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIHJ1bGVzLg0KPg0KPiBUaGFuayB5b3UsDQo+DQo+IE1hcnRpbiAoYXMgTDNW UE4gY28tY2hhaXIpDQoKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwoKQ2UgbWVzc2FnZSBldCBzZXMgcGllY2VzIGpvaW50ZXMg cGV1dmVudCBjb250ZW5pciBkZXMgaW5mb3JtYXRpb25zIGNvbmZpZGVudGllbGxlcyBvdSBwcml2 aWxlZ2llZXMgZXQgbmUgZG9pdmVudCBkb25jCnBhcyBldHJlIGRpZmZ1c2VzLCBleHBsb2l0ZXMg b3UgY29waWVzIHNhbnMgYXV0b3Jpc2F0aW9uLiBTaSB2b3VzIGF2ZXogcmVjdSBjZSBtZXNzYWdl IHBhciBlcnJldXIsIHZldWlsbGV6IGxlIHNpZ25hbGVyCmEgbCdleHBlZGl0ZXVyIGV0IGxlIGRl dHJ1aXJlIGFpbnNpIHF1ZSBsZXMgcGllY2VzIGpvaW50ZXMuIExlcyBtZXNzYWdlcyBlbGVjdHJv bmlxdWVzIGV0YW50IHN1c2NlcHRpYmxlcyBkJ2FsdGVyYXRpb24sCkZyYW5jZSBUZWxlY29tIC0g T3JhbmdlIGRlY2xpbmUgdG91dGUgcmVzcG9uc2FiaWxpdGUgc2kgY2UgbWVzc2FnZSBhIGV0ZSBh bHRlcmUsIGRlZm9ybWUgb3UgZmFsc2lmaWUuIE1lcmNpLgoKVGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIGFuZCBpdHMg YXR0YWNobWVudHMgbWF5IGNvbnRhaW4gY29uZmlkZW50aWFsIG9yIHByaXZpbGVnZWQgaW5mb3Jt YXRpb24gdGhhdCBtYXkgYmUgcHJvdGVjdGVkIGJ5IGxhdzsKdGhleSBzaG91bGQgbm90IGJlIGRp c3RyaWJ1dGVkLCB1c2VkIG9yIGNvcGllZCB3aXRob3V0IGF1dGhvcmlzYXRpb24uCklmIHlvdSBo YXZlIHJlY2VpdmVkIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgaW4gZXJyb3IsIHBsZWFzZSBub3RpZnkgdGhlIHNlbmRl ciBhbmQgZGVsZXRlIHRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBhbmQgaXRzIGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzLgpBcyBlbWFpbHMg bWF5IGJlIGFsdGVyZWQsIEZyYW5jZSBUZWxlY29tIC0gT3JhbmdlIGlzIG5vdCBsaWFibGUgZm9y IG1lc3NhZ2VzIHRoYXQgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIG1vZGlmaWVkLCBjaGFuZ2VkIG9yIGZhbHNpZmllZC4K VGhhbmsgeW91LgoK From jrmitche@puck.nether.net Tue Dec 4 21:30:08 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1946121F85A5 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:30:08 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.603 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WnuO87LQ6M7X for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:30:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90EF921F8C1A for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:30:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.234.237.70] (108.sub-174-255-162.myvzw.com [174.255.162.108]) (authenticated bits=0) by puck.nether.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB55U4RM007557 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Dec 2012 00:30:05 -0500 References: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A523) From: Jon Mitchell Subject: Re: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:30:03 -0800 To: Martin Vigoureux X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]); Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:30:06 -0500 (EST) Cc: L3VPN X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 05:30:08 -0000 Support. -Jon On Dec 4, 2012, at 6:29 AM, Martin Vigoureux wrote: > Hello Working Group, >=20 > This e-mail starts a two-week poll on adopting > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all-00 > as WG document >=20 > This work results from a merge of previous drafts on the topic. >=20 > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). >=20 > This poll runs until December 18th. >=20 > Note that, Thomas being a co-author on this draft, I'll judge consensus to= adopt the document. >=20 > Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 > and 5378 for more details). >=20 > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft > will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author > and contributor. >=20 > If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author > or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of > any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >=20 > Thank you, >=20 > Martin (as L3VPN co-chair) From N.Leymann@telekom.de Wed Dec 5 04:44:02 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E31321F892A for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 04:44:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.649 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W-M5khGdKKq0 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 04:43:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from tcmail13.telekom.de (tcmail13.telekom.de [80.149.113.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B6A21F8921 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 04:43:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from he113415.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.65.81]) by tcmail11.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 05 Dec 2012 13:43:22 +0100 Received: from HE111543.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.90.96]) by HE113415.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([::1]) with mapi; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 13:43:14 +0100 From: To: Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 13:43:13 +0100 Subject: AW: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Index: AQHNzhH5EQMWRADRq0a2aXmDkECtCpgHOaTwgALvf0A= Message-ID: <9762ACF04FA26B4388476841256BDE02011695D1D97D@HE111543.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> References: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <9762ACF04FA26B4388476841256BDE02011695B6C352@HE111543.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> In-Reply-To: <9762ACF04FA26B4388476841256BDE02011695B6C352@HE111543.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> Accept-Language: de-DE Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 12:44:02 -0000 Follow up: I'm not aware of any IPR. Regards Nic -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von = Leymann, Nicolai Gesendet: Montag, 3. Dezember 2012 16:30 An: thomas.morin@orange.com; l3vpn@ietf.org Betreff: AW: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signa= ling-01 Support (as co-author). Nic -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von = thomas.morin@orange.com Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. November 2012 10:15 An: l3vpn@ietf.org Betreff: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling= -01 Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 [1]. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until December 13th. Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin & Thomas l3vpn chairs [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-= 01 ___________________________________________________________________________= ______________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confiden= tielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu= ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages el= ectroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete al= tere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged inf= ormation that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and dele= te this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for message= s that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From erosen@cisco.com Fri Dec 7 06:50:38 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9079521F8A1B for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 06:50:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q4aSv-+TQKt1 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 06:50:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66CC21F8983 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 06:50:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2596; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1354891837; x=1356101437; h=to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:reply-to:date:message-id:from; bh=YFc60RSbQSonUJKUizyJ83ao5G2tuPZBGJt6caXWQmw=; b=bz7imtcTH2otnGVfoiG4Xdsda8Vz8Lsfe5dBDMR0vf/0evgWyYTzw+DL GmXURIAgfeQ/VEWkZPCh6xNJnSO4EnicTgecZLjb+OnF1CtmtQ3SXi/jd uSbDS8CmPROpEHockLcYllDuWUN52gyOnP68icr2vfnOA/XNFIQvB9Ud+ c=; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6918"; a="150495274" Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2012 14:50:37 +0000 Received: from erosen-linux.cisco.com (erosen-linux.cisco.com [161.44.70.34]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qB7EoaAR009280 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 Dec 2012 14:50:37 GMT Received: from erosen-linux (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by erosen-linux.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qB7EoaKg006173; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 09:50:36 -0500 To: Yakov Rekhter Subject: Re: Last Call comments on draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-hub In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 19 Nov 2012 07:25:10 -0800. <201211191525.qAJFPA397494@magenta.juniper.net> Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 09:50:36 -0500 Message-ID: <6172.1354891836@erosen-linux> From: Eric Rosen Cc: erosen@cisco.com, L3VPN X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: erosen@cisco.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:50:38 -0000 Thanks for addressing most of my comments, and sorry for the delay getting back to you. There are just a few comments that I want to discuss further. 1. Section 7.9, "Use of Ingress Replication with I-PMSI A-D routes". The document should make it clear that these procedures are required to be implemented (by all the PEs of a given MVPN) ONLY under the following conditions: - At least one of those PEs is a V-hub or V-spoke PE for the given MVPN. - The given MVPN is configured to use the optional procedure of using Ingress Replication to instantiate an I-PMSI. 2. Abstract I continue to think that the second paragraph of the abstract is misleading in its claim that "the approach described in this document may allow to reduce bandwidth inefficiency", given that the approach may also allow an increase in bandwidth inefficiency. Maybe replace "may" with "may under certain circumstances". (I also continue to think that the abstract would be improved if it mentioned that the draft uses "hub and spoke" procedures to provide any-to-any service, but that's just a suggestion.) 3. Multi-level hierarchy outside the scope of the document When I pointed out that the procedures don't appear to generalize easily to support of a multi-level hierarchy, you replied "multi-level hierarchy is outside the scope of this document". That's fine, but the document should have a statement to that effect. 4. Installation of default route in a V-hub VRF I'm still having trouble understanding the point of the following paragraph: When a V-hub of a given VPN originates a VPN-IP default route for that VPN, the V-hub MUST NOT install in its VRF of that VPN a default route, unless this route has been originated either (a) as a result of the V-hub receiving an IP default route from one of the CEs of that VPN connected to it, or (b) as a result of the V-hub receiving (and importing) a VPN-IP default route from some other PE, or (c) the VRF being provisioned with a default route pointing to the routing table on the same PE that maintains the Internet routes. Could you give an example to show that this restriction is necessary? 5. E/IBGP Load Balancing at a V-hub for packets whose label corresponds to the VPN-IP default route. This is an optimization that may be useful under certain circumstances, but not others. The draft should make it clear that this behavior is optional. From yakov@juniper.net Fri Dec 7 07:22:20 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C63721F865B for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 07:22:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.435 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.164, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MGqhRa-f7Sa2 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 07:22:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod7og111.obsmtp.com (exprod7og111.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765D021F851B for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 07:22:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob111.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUMIJqpN2mvJVjmFqGWq8O9H/ZvYYlEru@postini.com; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 07:22:19 PST Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 07:20:52 -0800 Received: from juniper.net (sapphire.juniper.net [172.17.28.108]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id qB7FKp310299; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 07:20:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yakov@juniper.net) Message-ID: <201212071520.qB7FKp310299@magenta.juniper.net> To: Subject: Re: Last Call comments on draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-hub In-Reply-To: <6172.1354891836@erosen-linux> References: <6172.1354891836@erosen-linux> X-MH-In-Reply-To: Eric Rosen message dated "Fri, 07 Dec 2012 09:50:36 -0500." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <88075.1354893650.1@juniper.net> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 07:20:51 -0800 From: Yakov Rekhter Cc: Yakov Rekhter , L3VPN X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:22:20 -0000 Eric, > Thanks for addressing most of my comments, and sorry for the delay getting > back to you. There are just a few comments that I want to discuss further. > > 1. Section 7.9, "Use of Ingress Replication with I-PMSI A-D routes". > > The document should make it clear that these procedures are required to > be implemented (by all the PEs of a given MVPN) ONLY under the following > conditions: > > - At least one of those PEs is a V-hub or V-spoke PE for the given MVPN. > > - The given MVPN is configured to use the optional procedure of using > Ingress Replication to instantiate an I-PMSI. Will do. > 2. Abstract > > I continue to think that the second paragraph of the abstract is > misleading in its claim that "the approach described in this document may > allow to reduce bandwidth inefficiency", given that the approach may also > allow an increase in bandwidth inefficiency. Maybe replace "may" with > "may under certain circumstances". Will do. > (I also continue to think that the abstract would be improved if it > mentioned that the draft uses "hub and spoke" procedures to provide > any-to-any service, but that's just a suggestion.) > > 3. Multi-level hierarchy outside the scope of the document > > When I pointed out that the procedures don't appear to generalize easily > to support of a multi-level hierarchy, you replied "multi-level hierarchy > is outside the scope of this document". That's fine, but the document > should have a statement to that effect. Will do. > 4. Installation of default route in a V-hub VRF > > I'm still having trouble understanding the point of the following > paragraph: > > When a V-hub of a given VPN originates a VPN-IP default route for > that VPN, the V-hub MUST NOT install in its VRF of that VPN a > default route, unless this route has been originated either (a) as a > result of the V-hub receiving an IP default route from one of the > CEs of that VPN connected to it, or (b) as a result of the V-hub > receiving (and importing) a VPN-IP default route from some other PE, > or (c) the VRF being provisioned with a default route pointing to > the routing table on the same PE that maintains the Internet routes. > > Could you give an example to show that this restriction is necessary? Consider the example described in the first 5 paragraphs of section 8.1 of the draft (no Internet connectivity). If PE-3 (which is one of the V-hubs) would install in its VRF a default route, then what would be the next hop of that route ? > > 5. E/IBGP Load Balancing at a V-hub for packets whose label corresponds to > the VPN-IP default route. > > This is an optimization that may be useful under certain circumstances, > but not others. The draft should make it clear that this behavior is > optional. I think the draft already does this - from section 4: When a multi-homed site is connected to a V-hub and a V-spoke, then the V-hub uses the following OPTIONAL procedures to support IBGP/EBGP ^^^^^^^^ load balancing for the site's inbound traffic that has been originated by some other V-spoke associated with the V-hub. Yakov. From spencer.giacalone@thomsonreuters.com Mon Dec 10 12:34:35 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16D821F864D for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:34:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wy4BHgMvjICq for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:34:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout2-trp.thomsonreuters.com (mailout2-trp.thomsonreuters.com [163.231.6.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F40421F8646 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:34:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from trpusmneagrly02.int.westgroup.com (relay2 [163.231.22.113]) by mailout2-trp.thomsonreuters.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qBAKYWBC016557 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:34:32 GMT Received: from EAGH-ERFPHUB04.ERF.thomson.com (xch4 [163.231.29.195]) by trpusmneagrly02.int.westgroup.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qBAKYUY1012485 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:34:32 GMT Received: from C111XUQEHUB15.ERF.thomson.com (163.231.23.72) by EAGH-ERFPHUB04.ERF.thomson.com (163.231.29.195) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.298.4; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:34:31 -0600 Received: from C111TZDHMBX75.ERF.thomson.com ([fe80::8c3b:6552:55ba:e6b6]) by C111XUQEHUB15.ERF.thomson.com ([fe80::e817:b2f3:2c3d:3da%12]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:34:31 -0600 From: To: , Subject: RE: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Index: AQHNzhH5EQMWRADRq0a2aXmDkECtCpgSj0Rg Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:34:30 +0000 Message-ID: References: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> In-Reply-To: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.206.30.8] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 01:03:31 -0800 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:34:35 -0000 SSBzdXBwb3J0IHRoaXMNCg0KDQoNClNwZW5jZXIgR2lhY2Fsb25lDQpHbG9iYWwgSGVhZCBvZiBO ZXR3b3JrIEFyY2hpdGVjdHVyZQ0KDQpUaG9tc29uIFJldXRlcnMgDQpQaG9uZTrCoCsxLTY0Ni04 MjItMzIwOQ0KTW9iaWxlOsKgKzEtMzQ3LTQxMy0yNDk2DQpzcGVuY2VyLmdpYWNhbG9uZUB0aG9t c29ucmV1dGVycy5jb20NCnRob21zb25yZXV0ZXJzLmNvbQ0KDQoNCg0KLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBN ZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IGwzdnBuLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmcgW21haWx0bzpsM3Zwbi1i b3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgdGhvbWFzLm1vcmluQG9yYW5nZS5jb20NClNl bnQ6IFRodXJzZGF5LCBOb3ZlbWJlciAyOSwgMjAxMiA0OjE1IEFNDQpUbzogbDN2cG5AaWV0Zi5v cmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFBvbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0aW9uOiBkcmFmdC13aWpuYW5kcy1sM3Zwbi1tbGRw LXZyZi1pbi1iYW5kLXNpZ25hbGluZy0wMQ0KDQpIZWxsbyB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwLA0KDQpUaGlz IGVtYWlsIHN0YXJ0cyBhIHR3by13ZWVrIHBvbGwgb24gYWRvcHRpbmcNCmRyYWZ0LXdpam5hbmRz LWwzdnBuLW1sZHAtdnJmLWluLWJhbmQtc2lnbmFsaW5nLTAxIFsxXS4NCg0KUGxlYXNlIHNlbmQg Y29tbWVudHMgdG8gdGhlIGxpc3QgYW5kIHN0YXRlIGlmIHlvdSBzdXBwb3J0IGFkb3B0aW9uIG9y DQpub3QgKGluIHRoZSBsYXRlciBjYXNlLCBwbGVhc2UgYWxzbyBzdGF0ZSB0aGUgcmVhc29ucyku DQoNClRoaXMgcG9sbCBydW5zIHVudGlsIERlY2VtYmVyIDEzdGguDQoNCg0KQ29pbmNpZGVudGFs bHksIHdlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQNCmFw cGxpZXMgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdCwgdG8gZW5zdXJlIHRoYXQgSVBSIGhhcyBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3Nl ZCBpbg0KY29tcGxpYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgSVBSIHJ1bGVzIChzZWUgUkZDcyAzOTc5LCA0ODc5 LCAzNjY5DQphbmQgNTM3OCBmb3IgbW9yZSBkZXRhaWxzKS4NCg0KSWYgeW91IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQg YXMgYSBkb2N1bWVudCBhdXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IgcGxlYXNlIHJlc3BvbmQgdG8NCnRo aXMgZW1haWwgd2hldGhlciBvciBub3QgeW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgcmVsZXZhbnQgSVBS LiBUaGUgZHJhZnQNCndpbGwgbm90IGJlIGFkb3B0ZWQgdW50aWwgYSByZXNwb25zZSBoYXMgYmVl biByZWNlaXZlZCBmcm9tIGVhY2ggYXV0aG9yDQphbmQgY29udHJpYnV0b3IuDQoNCklmIHlvdSBh cmUgb24gdGhlIEwzVlBOIFdHIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdCBidXQgYXJlIG5vdCBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYW4g YXV0aG9yIA0Kb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IsIHRoZW4gcGxlYXNlIGV4cGxpY2l0bHkgcmVzcG9uZCBv bmx5IGlmIHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgDQphbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgaGFzIG5vdCB5ZXQgYmVlbiBk aXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29uZm9ybWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIHJ1bGVzLg0KDQpUaGFuayB5b3UsDQoN Ck1hcnRpbiAmIFRob21hcw0KbDN2cG4gY2hhaXJzDQoNClsxXSANCmh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRm Lm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LXdpam5hbmRzLWwzdnBuLW1sZHAtdnJmLWluLWJhbmQtc2lnbmFsaW5n LTAxDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fDQoNCkNlIG1lc3NhZ2UgZXQgc2VzIHBpZWNlcyBqb2ludGVzIHBldXZlbnQg Y29udGVuaXIgZGVzIGluZm9ybWF0aW9ucyBjb25maWRlbnRpZWxsZXMgb3UgcHJpdmlsZWdpZWVz IGV0IG5lIGRvaXZlbnQgZG9uYw0KcGFzIGV0cmUgZGlmZnVzZXMsIGV4cGxvaXRlcyBvdSBjb3Bp ZXMgc2FucyBhdXRvcmlzYXRpb24uIFNpIHZvdXMgYXZleiByZWN1IGNlIG1lc3NhZ2UgcGFyIGVy cmV1ciwgdmV1aWxsZXogbGUgc2lnbmFsZXINCmEgbCdleHBlZGl0ZXVyIGV0IGxlIGRldHJ1aXJl IGFpbnNpIHF1ZSBsZXMgcGllY2VzIGpvaW50ZXMuIExlcyBtZXNzYWdlcyBlbGVjdHJvbmlxdWVz IGV0YW50IHN1c2NlcHRpYmxlcyBkJ2FsdGVyYXRpb24sDQpGcmFuY2UgVGVsZWNvbSAtIE9yYW5n ZSBkZWNsaW5lIHRvdXRlIHJlc3BvbnNhYmlsaXRlIHNpIGNlIG1lc3NhZ2UgYSBldGUgYWx0ZXJl LCBkZWZvcm1lIG91IGZhbHNpZmllLiBNZXJjaS4NCg0KVGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIGFuZCBpdHMgYXR0 YWNobWVudHMgbWF5IGNvbnRhaW4gY29uZmlkZW50aWFsIG9yIHByaXZpbGVnZWQgaW5mb3JtYXRp b24gdGhhdCBtYXkgYmUgcHJvdGVjdGVkIGJ5IGxhdzsNCnRoZXkgc2hvdWxkIG5vdCBiZSBkaXN0 cmlidXRlZCwgdXNlZCBvciBjb3BpZWQgd2l0aG91dCBhdXRob3Jpc2F0aW9uLg0KSWYgeW91IGhh dmUgcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBpbiBlcnJvciwgcGxlYXNlIG5vdGlmeSB0aGUgc2VuZGVy IGFuZCBkZWxldGUgdGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIGFuZCBpdHMgYXR0YWNobWVudHMuDQpBcyBlbWFpbHMg bWF5IGJlIGFsdGVyZWQsIEZyYW5jZSBUZWxlY29tIC0gT3JhbmdlIGlzIG5vdCBsaWFibGUgZm9y IG1lc3NhZ2VzIHRoYXQgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIG1vZGlmaWVkLCBjaGFuZ2VkIG9yIGZhbHNpZmllZC4N ClRoYW5rIHlvdS4NCg0K From terry.pattinson@thomsonreuters.com Tue Dec 11 00:57:51 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA9F21F879E for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:57:51 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -8.38 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.38 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, TVD_SPACE_RATIO=2.219] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LgkuOZqG6lYf for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:57:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout1-trp.thomsonreuters.com (mailout1-trp.thomsonreuters.com [163.231.6.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB28A21F8782 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:57:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from trpusmneagrly01.int.westgroup.com (relay1 [163.231.22.97]) by mailout1-trp.thomsonreuters.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qBB8vmGd012833 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:57:48 GMT Received: from EAGH-ERFPHUB05.ERF.thomson.com (xch20 [163.231.29.164]) by trpusmneagrly01.int.westgroup.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qBB8vgNR016420 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:57:47 GMT Received: from UK2P-ERFMHUB03.ERF.thomson.com (10.29.4.14) by EAGH-ERFPHUB05.ERF.thomson.com (163.231.29.164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.298.4; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 02:57:47 -0600 Received: from UK2P-ERFMMBX12.ERF.thomson.com ([fe80::65f6:7902:6915:da4f]) by UK2P-ERFMHUB03.ERF.thomson.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:57:38 +0000 From: To: , Subject: RE: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Index: AQHNzhH5EQMWRADRq0a2aXmDkECtCpgTXtBK Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:57:36 +0000 Message-ID: <94E846FEE1259643B3C8DC5478BEDD63B0655F@UK2P-ERFMMBX12.ERF.thomson.com> References: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> In-Reply-To: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-GB X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.31.2.20] x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.0.0.4225-7.000.1014-19438.003 x-tm-as-result: No--22.034400-8.000000-31 x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 02:10:27 -0800 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:07:08 -0000 Support= From william.zayas@fibercrossing.net Tue Dec 11 04:00:05 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BA721F8820 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:00:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.187 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=1.456, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bM6X3u4xWZQk for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:00:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from atl4mhob07.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob07.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40ED321F881E for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:00:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by atl4mhob07.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBBC03Sr001822 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:00:03 -0500 Message-Id: <201212111200.qBBC03Sr001822@atl4mhob07.myregisteredsite.com> Received: (qmail 24054 invoked by uid 0); 11 Dec 2012 15:58:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.3?) (william.zayas@fibercrossing.net@173.79.9.217) by 0 with ESMTPA; 11 Dec 2012 15:58:21 -0000 To: terry.pattinson@thomsonreuters.com, thomas.morin@orange.com, l3vpn@ietf.org From: "=?utf-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBaYXlhcw==?=" Subject: =?utf-8?B?UmU6IFBvbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0aW9uOglkcmFmdC13aWpuYW5kcy1sM3Zwbi1tbGRw?= =?utf-8?B?LXZyZi1pbi1iYW5kLXNpZ25hbGluZy0wMQ==?= Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:00:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_0_1355227207662" X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:00:05 -0000 ------=_Part_0_1355227207662 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline U3VwcG9ydC4KCkJpbGwsCgpDaGVlcnMsCgotLS0tLSBSZXBseSBtZXNzYWdlIC0tLS0tCkZyb206 IHRlcnJ5LnBhdHRpbnNvbkB0aG9tc29ucmV1dGVycy5jb20KVG86IDx0aG9tYXMubW9yaW5Ab3Jh bmdlLmNvbT4sIDxsM3ZwbkBpZXRmLm9yZz4KU3ViamVjdDogUG9sbCBmb3IgYWRvcHRpb246CWRy YWZ0LXdpam5hbmRzLWwzdnBuLW1sZHAtdnJmLWluLWJhbmQtc2lnbmFsaW5nLTAxCkRhdGU6IFR1 ZSwgRGVjIDExLCAyMDEyIDM6NTcgYW0KCgpTdXBwb3J0Cg== ------=_Part_0_1355227207662 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline U3VwcG9ydC48YnI+PGJyPkJpbGwsPGJyPjxicj5DaGVlcnMsPGJyPjxicj4tLS0tLSBSZXBseSBt ZXNzYWdlIC0tLS0tPGJyPkZyb206IHRlcnJ5LnBhdHRpbnNvbkB0aG9tc29ucmV1dGVycy5jb208 YnI+VG86ICZsdDt0aG9tYXMubW9yaW5Ab3JhbmdlLmNvbSZndDssICZsdDtsM3ZwbkBpZXRmLm9y ZyZndDs8YnI+U3ViamVjdDogUG9sbCBmb3IgYWRvcHRpb246CWRyYWZ0LXdpam5hbmRzLWwzdnBu LW1sZHAtdnJmLWluLWJhbmQtc2lnbmFsaW5nLTAxPGJyPkRhdGU6IFR1ZSwgRGVjIDExLCAyMDEy IDM6NTcgYW08YnI+PGJyPjxicj5TdXBwb3J0PGJyPg== ------=_Part_0_1355227207662-- From sowkrish@cisco.com Tue Dec 11 07:05:17 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEEA21F8738 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:05:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P6DcSspVVSZY for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:05:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FBA21F8675 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:05:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1355238317; x=1356447917; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=lX1xW4iKhkcqo6tSXo4UmvblhHvWycyUWmNIdXQ0kC4=; b=YklOmDDiEGDc3JuFFxQQXewFtV/7aFp7hkQBlGXRhS8LNv0ZvJRUjOmb mp+/J2v8MR3PLWG20rNvd26QdkIDwm+OOzUX5TtfaE1o74QteNAY6lwwH EEPGH522eBPDcYIgBWBM6mIjJPPw1flaBzAIvJzbwN/HXzSofAzbK3L7y 0=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAFpKx1CtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABFgmy7WBZzgiABBBkhUQEqFEImAQQBGogJAaphkGmQLGEDpk+Cc4Ii X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6922"; a="151466452" Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Dec 2012 15:05:14 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBBF5ENZ026926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:05:14 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([fe80::5404:b599:9f57:834b]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:05:14 -0600 From: "Sowmya Krishnaswamy (sowkrish)" To: "thomas.morin@orange.com" , "l3vpn@ietf.org" Subject: Poll for adoption draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Index: Ac3XsOs5mRpUmh4XQE6/hkuNGUrb7Q== Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:05:13 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.21.118.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:05:17 -0000 Support From lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn Tue Dec 11 16:41:55 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AB721E80AD for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:41:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h1W1d12cFmc5 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:41:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EA111E80A3 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:41:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.168.119]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTP id 101A6125C18B for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:43:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from mse01.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.3.20]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 1855971A962; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:30:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id qBC0faa6085193; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:41:36 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn) In-Reply-To: To: thomas.morin@orange.com Subject: Re: Poll for adoption:draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005 Message-ID: From: lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:41:22 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP1 HF212|May 23, 2012) at 2012-12-12 08:41:32, Serialize complete at 2012-12-12 08:41:32 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0003D24748257AD2_=" X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn qBC0faa6085193 Cc: l3vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:41:55 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 0003D24748257AD2_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Yes, support. Lizhong > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:14:46 +0000 > From: > To: "l3vpn@ietf.org" > Subject: Poll for adoption: > draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 > Message-ID: > > <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13. > corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 [1]. > > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > > This poll runs until December 13th. > > > Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 > and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft > will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author > and contributor. > > If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author > or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of > any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you, > > Martin & Thomas > l3vpn chairs > > [1] > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous > avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les > messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a > ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or > privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender > and delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for > messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > --=_alternative 0003D24748257AD2_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Yes, support.

Lizhong

>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:14:46 +0000
> From: <thomas.morin@orange.com>
> To: "l3vpn@ietf.org" <l3vpn@ietf.org>
> Subject: Poll for adoption:
>    draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01
> Message-ID:
>    
> <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.
> corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
>    
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello working group,
>
> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
> draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 [1].
>
> Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or
> not (in the later case, please also state the reasons).
>
> This poll runs until December 13th.
>
>
> Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that
> applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in
> compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
> and 5378 for more details).
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft
> will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author
> and contributor.
>
> If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author
> or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of
> any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Martin & Thomas
> l3vpn chairs
>
> [1]
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous
> avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les
> messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a
> ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
> privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender
> and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for
> messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
> --=_alternative 0003D24748257AD2_=-- From sue.gallagher@thomsonreuters.com Tue Dec 11 23:53:45 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D778F21F88DD for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:53:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hrEYzc5eOXm2 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:53:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout2-trp.thomsonreuters.com (mailout2-trp.thomsonreuters.com [163.231.6.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C00421F892D for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:53:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from trpusmneagrly02.int.westgroup.com (relay2 [163.231.22.113]) by mailout2-trp.thomsonreuters.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qBC7rcPU002881 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:53:38 GMT Received: from EAGE-ERFPHUB02.ERF.thomson.com (xch7 [163.231.23.34]) by trpusmneagrly02.int.westgroup.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qBC7rbaY025821 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:53:38 GMT Received: from UK2P-ERFMHUB02.ERF.thomson.com (10.29.4.13) by EAGE-ERFPHUB02.ERF.thomson.com (163.231.23.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.298.4; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:53:37 -0600 Received: from UK2P-ERFMMBX12.ERF.thomson.com ([fe80::65f6:7902:6915:da4f]) by UK2P-ERFMHUB02.ERF.thomson.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:53:36 +0000 From: To: , Subject: RE: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Index: AQHNzhH5EQMWRADRq0a2aXmDkECtCpgU32mg Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:53:35 +0000 Message-ID: <8DDBA0ADA20FBD4AB3C57DE5C99D9A5618B6DA3F@UK2P-ERFMMBX12.ERF.thomson.com> References: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> In-Reply-To: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.29.4.140] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:16:56 -0800 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:56:00 -0000 Support -----Original Message----- From: l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of thomas.morin@orange.com Sent: 29 November 2012 09:15 To: l3vpn@ietf.org Subject: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 [1]. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until December 13th. Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin & Thomas l3vpn chairs [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and information company. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson Reuters. From internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed Dec 12 06:21:32 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E7D21F89CE; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:21:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.535 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id isI3dRyhE9pN; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:21:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5FF21F898D; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:21:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-hub-04.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.36 Message-ID: <20121212142130.8567.28496.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:21:30 -0800 Cc: l3vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:21:32 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 3 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : Virtual Hub-and-Spoke in BGP/MPLS VPNs Author(s) : Huajin Jeng James Uttaro Luay Jalil Bruno Decraene Yakov Rekhter Rahul Aggarwal Filename : draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-hub-04.txt Pages : 25 Date : 2012-12-12 Abstract: With BGP/MPLS VPNs any-to-any connectivity among sites of a given Virtual Private Network would require each Provider Edge router that has one or more of these sites connected to it to hold all the routes of that Virtual Private Network. The approach described in this document allows to reduce the number of Provider Edge routers that have to maintain all these routes by requiring only a subset of these routers to maintain all these routes. Furthermore, when Provider Edge routers use ingress replication to carry multicast traffic of VPN customers, the approach described in this document may under certain circumstances allow to reduce bandwidth inefficiency associated with ingress replication, and to redistribute the replication load among Provider Edge routers. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-hub There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-hub-04 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-hub-04 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From yakov@juniper.net Wed Dec 12 06:26:20 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5799021F8A33 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:26:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.455 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.144, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jOeygARG5P+a for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:25:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod7og121.obsmtp.com (exprod7og121.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392AF21F85C4 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:25:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob121.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUMiT9Xi1Sl8vqeRUShUjidoe1OLME6Vk@postini.com; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:25:57 PST Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:23:19 -0800 Received: from juniper.net (sapphire.juniper.net [172.17.28.108]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id qBCENJ326229 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:23:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yakov@juniper.net) Message-ID: <201212121423.qBCENJ326229@magenta.juniper.net> To: Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-hub-04.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <14685.1355322198.1@juniper.net> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:23:18 -0800 From: Yakov Rekhter X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:26:20 -0000 Folks, This version of the draft addresses the last set of comments from Eric Rosen (Dec 7, 2012). Yakov. ------- Forwarded Message Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:21:30 -0800 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org cc: l3vpn@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-hub-04.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Layer 3 Virtual Private Networks Working Grou p of the IETF. Title : Virtual Hub-and-Spoke in BGP/MPLS VPNs Author(s) : Huajin Jeng James Uttaro Luay Jalil Bruno Decraene Yakov Rekhter Rahul Aggarwal Filename : draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-hub-04.txt Pages : 25 Date : 2012-12-12 Abstract: With BGP/MPLS VPNs any-to-any connectivity among sites of a given Virtual Private Network would require each Provider Edge router that has one or more of these sites connected to it to hold all the routes of that Virtual Private Network. The approach described in this document allows to reduce the number of Provider Edge routers that have to maintain all these routes by requiring only a subset of these routers to maintain all these routes. Furthermore, when Provider Edge routers use ingress replication to carry multicast traffic of VPN customers, the approach described in this document may under certain circumstances allow to reduce bandwidth inefficiency associated with ingress replication, and to redistribute the replication load among Provider Edge routers. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-hub There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-hub-04 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-hub-04 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt ------- End of Forwarded Message From erosen@cisco.com Mon Dec 17 12:21:05 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6DB21F88A9 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:21:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sEDFC+bI02Nu for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:21:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F04D21F889C for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:21:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=189; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1355775662; x=1356985262; h=to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:reply-to:date:message-id:from; bh=bh6wGsd6be1yjszn0kieM6kzNWMqmSZ/hpdMvkCcf4I=; b=gT73itvEW+dQUxLf5lGtwx8nA2MkE38R5EOtWCAcFjrUhQURbghDFVXL nJtcq00HO6GBacXFXtgNz7zDQIB5rzTC0rdGTsTNQxt9JwfwNlIzk48UL ic1dzBKtw9lNRpZ3prfzrMYpEHgE+ZZ59oGcvGuRex3eE6ZY2W4PSFjtp 8=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,304,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="63701331" Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2012 20:21:02 +0000 Received: from erosen-linux.cisco.com (erosen-linux.cisco.com [161.44.70.34]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBHKKxig023482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 17 Dec 2012 20:21:01 GMT Received: from erosen-linux (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by erosen-linux.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBHKKwff019987; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:20:59 -0500 To: Martin Vigoureux Subject: Re: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:29:29 +0100. <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:20:58 -0500 Message-ID: <19986.1355775658@erosen-linux> From: Eric Rosen Cc: L3VPN X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: erosen@cisco.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 20:21:05 -0000 > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. Replying as co-author, not aware of any IPR. From agmalis@gmail.com Mon Dec 17 12:34:48 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F72D21F84D7 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:34:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.298 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fEsvCr1186es for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:34:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1651621F84D4 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:34:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c13so9936841ieb.31 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:34:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=vWn0txWbhBjNFbO4PvR9cC4kWZQzNzDxf/+0WeX0ay8=; b=QYLQE/sAqYYqR4JkIc3efDw5MZc+XjtQLFkX6/smdyS5xPgrGUORiN/DqetoHR+N7c lQHjxqdYM2jEQt3IzpedcjAgQRtvqNOatXAU7KydrUHhQcNR5vMycw/fBQKiOLVCo36q 1Qg3acfzJ5Viby80lWK4PA1+pPvAfJcfX10QO0CZJCYSBB6RopRyjTMpgTYE2sIvMaCq 1S+C7bYOCAaHGA/BymThi4JtZJ35gDrGDOYXS7e6JsarhwdVT2rNl31ehB49auF3tptC unw1S3MyATthckuz/+H+PeC1rR1EW4Cf9OTPIE41USWrjxJoKfKz3WXHk0TZPyX8wmUQ Zb7A== Received: by 10.50.12.138 with SMTP id y10mr10425035igb.58.1355776480669; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:34:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.51.228 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:34:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> References: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> From: "Andrew G. Malis" Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:34:19 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all To: Martin Vigoureux Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340517866f7d04d1124f34 Cc: L3VPN X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 20:34:48 -0000 --14dae9340517866f7d04d1124f34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I support adoption of this draft, thanks to all the previous work it might even be ready soon for WGLC!! :-) Cheers, Andy On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Martin Vigoureux < martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > Hello Working Group, > > This e-mail starts a two-week poll on adopting > http://tools.ietf.org/html/**draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-**extranet-all-00 > as WG document > > This work results from a merge of previous drafts on the topic. > > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > > This poll runs until December 18th. > > Note that, Thomas being a co-author on this draft, I'll judge consensus to > adopt the document. > > Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 > and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft > will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author > and contributor. > > If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author > or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of > any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you, > > Martin (as L3VPN co-chair) > --14dae9340517866f7d04d1124f34 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I support adoption of this draft, thanks to all the previous work it might = even be ready soon for WGLC!! :-)

Cheers,
Andy



On Tue, Dec 4= , 2012 at 9:29 AM, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@al= catel-lucent.com> wrote:
Hello Working Group,

This e-mail starts a two-week poll on adopting
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-l3vpn-mv= pn-extranet-all-00
as WG document

This work results from a merge of previous drafts on the topic.

Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or
not (in the later case, please also state the reasons).

This poll runs until December 18th.

Note that, Thomas being a co-author on this draft, I'll judge consensus= to adopt the document.

Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that
applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in
compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft
will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author
and contributor.

If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author
or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of
any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you,

Martin (as L3VPN co-chair)

--14dae9340517866f7d04d1124f34-- From mach.chen@huawei.com Mon Dec 17 17:20:34 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C664611E80A3 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:20:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.314 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.314 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.685, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id te+rk8a-LqCr for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:20:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4888611E809A for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:20:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AMO94707; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:20:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:20:15 +0000 Received: from SZXEML428-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.72.61.36) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:20:20 +0000 Received: from SZXEML511-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.138]) by szxeml428-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.72.61.36]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:20:15 +0800 From: Mach Chen To: Martin Vigoureux , L3VPN Subject: RE: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Thread-Index: AQHN0ivQadwX1U3LBUeziEhbtKdzPZgd1zDw Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:20:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.96.103] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:20:34 -0000 Support. Best regards, Mach > -----Original Message----- > From: l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Martin Vigoureux > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 10:29 PM > To: L3VPN > Subject: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all >=20 > Hello Working Group, >=20 > This e-mail starts a two-week poll on adopting > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all-00 > as WG document >=20 > This work results from a merge of previous drafts on the topic. >=20 > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). >=20 > This poll runs until December 18th. >=20 > Note that, Thomas being a co-author on this draft, I'll judge consensus > to adopt the document. >=20 > Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 > and 5378 for more details). >=20 > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft > will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author > and contributor. >=20 > If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author > or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of > any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >=20 > Thank you, >=20 > Martin (as L3VPN co-chair) From yiqunc@microsoft.com Mon Dec 17 23:17:18 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE37821F8AE5 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:17:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.798 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.201, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oieADHd3QlJX for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:17:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F0021F8AE0 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:17:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail240-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.248) by CH1EHSOBE017.bigfish.com (10.43.70.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:17:15 +0000 Received: from mail240-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail240-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7B0FC0148; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:17:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:autodiscover.service.exchange.microsoft.com; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -23 X-BigFish: VS-23(zz9371I542I1432Izz1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz1033IL8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839h944hd25hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h1155h) Received-SPF: pass (mail240-ch1: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=yiqunc@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ; Received: from mail240-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail240-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1355815033394624_9678; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS033.bigfish.com (snatpool3.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.227]) by mail240-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF3E92004B; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by CH1EHSMHS033.bigfish.com (10.43.70.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:17:13 +0000 Received: from TK5EX14MBXC274.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.3.63]) by TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.7.153]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.003; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:17:11 +0000 From: Yiqun Cai To: "erosen@cisco.com" , Martin Vigoureux Subject: RE: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Thread-Index: AQHN3JQZPwgnqGbuqEuWU/rDipAZGJgeJYfg Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:17:10 +0000 Message-ID: <0D12C66279647643A9523DE4CB5BEAB4095EC688@TK5EX14MBXC274.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> References: Your message of Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:29:29 +0100. <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> <19986.1355775658@erosen-linux> In-Reply-To: <19986.1355775658@erosen-linux> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.34] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com Cc: L3VPN X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:17:18 -0000 Replying as co-author, I am not aware of any IPR.=20 -- Yiqun > -----Original Message----- > From: l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Eric Rosen > Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 12:21 PM > To: Martin Vigoureux > Cc: L3VPN > Subject: Re: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all >=20 >=20 > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond > > to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. >=20 > Replying as co-author, not aware of any IPR. From jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com Mon Dec 17 23:41:14 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7378321F8937 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:41:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.179 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.179 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.180, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sg4MQtofJHRx for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:41:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E421821F892E for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:41:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.93]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id qBI7qUx0028297; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:52:32 -0600 Received: from EUSAAMB109.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.126]) by EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.93]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 02:41:05 -0500 From: Jeff Tantsura To: Martin Vigoureux Subject: Re: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Thread-Index: AQHN0ivQs1h2bV4QhEWiWZoQ7/fHzpgeQbow Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:41:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: L3VPN X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:41:14 -0000 Yes/support Regards, Jeff On Dec 4, 2012, at 15:29, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote: > Hello Working Group, >=20 > This e-mail starts a two-week poll on adopting > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all-00 > as WG document >=20 > This work results from a merge of previous drafts on the topic. >=20 > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). >=20 > This poll runs until December 18th. >=20 > Note that, Thomas being a co-author on this draft, I'll judge consensus t= o adopt the document. >=20 > Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 > and 5378 for more details). >=20 > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft > will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author > and contributor. >=20 > If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author > or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of > any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >=20 > Thank you, >=20 > Martin (as L3VPN co-chair) From ice@cisco.com Mon Dec 17 23:49:49 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C687421F86A9 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:49:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AiOo4II7+9pX for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:49:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038D621F866D for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:49:48 -0800 (PST) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBI7ni3h015474; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:49:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from ams-iwijnand-8719.cisco.com (ams-iwijnand-8719.cisco.com [10.55.191.154]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBI7nhdo018124; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:49:44 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all From: IJsbrand Wijnands In-Reply-To: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:49:43 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> To: Martin Vigoureux X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Cc: L3VPN X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:49:49 -0000 As co-author I support, not aware of any IPR. Thx, Ice. On 04 Dec 2012, at 15:29, Martin Vigoureux = wrote: > Hello Working Group, >=20 > This e-mail starts a two-week poll on adopting > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all-00 > as WG document >=20 > This work results from a merge of previous drafts on the topic. >=20 > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). >=20 > This poll runs until December 18th. >=20 > Note that, Thomas being a co-author on this draft, I'll judge = consensus to adopt the document. >=20 > Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 > and 5378 for more details). >=20 > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond = to > this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft > will not be adopted until a response has been received from each = author > and contributor. >=20 > If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an = author > or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware = of > any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF = rules. >=20 > Thank you, >=20 > Martin (as L3VPN co-chair) >=20 From william.zayas@fibercrossing.net Tue Dec 18 04:19:03 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FF521F8937 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 04:19:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.187 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=1.456, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Et2EbtHsnKZr for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 04:19:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from atl4mhob15.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob15.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844E821F892E for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 04:19:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by atl4mhob15.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBICJ1EJ022315 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:19:01 -0500 Message-Id: <201212181219.qBICJ1EJ022315@atl4mhob15.myregisteredsite.com> Received: (qmail 2919 invoked by uid 0); 18 Dec 2012 12:19:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.3?) (william.zayas@fibercrossing.net@173.79.9.217) by 0 with ESMTPA; 18 Dec 2012 12:19:00 -0000 To: erosen@cisco.com, "=?utf-8?B?TWFydGluIFZpZ291cmV1eA==?=" From: "=?utf-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBaYXlhcw==?=" Subject: =?utf-8?B?UmU6IFBvbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0aW9uIG9mIGRyYWZ0LXJvc2VuLWwzdnBuLW12cG4t?= =?utf-8?B?ZXh0cmFuZXQtYWxs?= Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:19:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_0_1355833146294" Cc: L3VPN X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:19:03 -0000 ------=_Part_0_1355833146294 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline U3VwcG9ydC4KCkJpbGwsCgotLS0tLSBSZXBseSBtZXNzYWdlIC0tLS0tCkZyb206ICJFcmljIFJv c2VuIiA8ZXJvc2VuQGNpc2NvLmNvbT4KVG86ICJNYXJ0aW4gVmlnb3VyZXV4IiA8bWFydGluLnZp Z291cmV1eEBhbGNhdGVsLWx1Y2VudC5jb20+CkNjOiAiTDNWUE4iIDxsM3ZwbkBpZXRmLm9yZz4K U3ViamVjdDogUG9sbCBmb3IgYWRvcHRpb24gb2YgZHJhZnQtcm9zZW4tbDN2cG4tbXZwbi1leHRy YW5ldC1hbGwKRGF0ZTogTW9uLCBEZWMgMTcsIDIwMTIgMzoyMCBwbQoKCgo+IElmIHlvdSBhcmUg bGlzdGVkIGFzIGEgZG9jdW1lbnQgYXV0aG9yIG9yIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yIHBsZWFzZSByZXNwb25k IHRvCj4gdGhpcyBlbWFpbCB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSByZWxl dmFudCBJUFIuCgpSZXBseWluZyBhcyBjby1hdXRob3IsIG5vdCBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSLgoK Cg== ------=_Part_0_1355833146294 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline U3VwcG9ydC48YnI+PGJyPkJpbGwsPGJyPjxicj4tLS0tLSBSZXBseSBtZXNzYWdlIC0tLS0tPGJy PkZyb206ICZxdW90O0VyaWMgUm9zZW4mcXVvdDsgJmx0O2Vyb3NlbkBjaXNjby5jb20mZ3Q7PGJy PlRvOiAmcXVvdDtNYXJ0aW4gVmlnb3VyZXV4JnF1b3Q7ICZsdDttYXJ0aW4udmlnb3VyZXV4QGFs Y2F0ZWwtbHVjZW50LmNvbSZndDs8YnI+Q2M6ICZxdW90O0wzVlBOJnF1b3Q7ICZsdDtsM3ZwbkBp ZXRmLm9yZyZndDs8YnI+U3ViamVjdDogUG9sbCBmb3IgYWRvcHRpb24gb2YgZHJhZnQtcm9zZW4t bDN2cG4tbXZwbi1leHRyYW5ldC1hbGw8YnI+RGF0ZTogTW9uLCBEZWMgMTcsIDIwMTIgMzoyMCBw bTxicj48YnI+PGJyPjxicj4mZ3Q7IElmIHlvdSBhcmUgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGEgZG9jdW1lbnQgYXV0 aG9yIG9yIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yIHBsZWFzZSByZXNwb25kIHRvPGJyPiZndDsgdGhpcyBlbWFpbCB3 aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSByZWxldmFudCBJUFIuPGJyPjxicj5S ZXBseWluZyBhcyBjby1hdXRob3IsIG5vdCBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSLjxicj48YnI+PGJyPg== ------=_Part_0_1355833146294-- From wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com Tue Dec 18 06:14:20 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C35221F8AA0 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 06:14:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.874 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.874 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.225, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LqR87YRVji6F for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 06:14:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from smail3.alcatel.fr (smail3.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7500B21F8A88 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 06:14:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.62]) by smail3.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id qBIE9ZGA026234 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:14:08 +0100 Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.39]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.62]) with mapi; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:13:31 +0100 From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" To: "thomas.morin@orange.com" , "l3vpn@ietf.org" Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:13:30 +0100 Subject: Re: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Index: Ac3dKdst8KpMmkCnRYWzMaXfOvyopQ== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <50B72786.2080001@orange.com> Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010 acceptlanguage: nl-NL, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.83 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:14:20 -0000 Support, not aware of IPR On 29/11/12 10:14, "thomas.morin@orange.com" wrote: >Hello working group, > >This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 [1]. > >Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or >not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > >This poll runs until December 13th. > > >Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that >applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in >compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 >and 5378 for more details). > >If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to >this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft >will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author >and contributor. > >If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author >or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of >any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > >Thank you, > >Martin & Thomas >l3vpn chairs > >[1]=20 >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling >-01 > From lucy.yong@huawei.com Tue Dec 18 08:11:00 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5715A21F8AD2 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:11:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.264 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.265, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R8BgWDLJ4-S3 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:10:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6249321F8ACB for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:10:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AMP67535; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:10:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:10:55 +0000 Received: from DFWEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.151) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:10:47 +0000 Received: from DFWEML505-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.124.31.100]) by dfweml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.151]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:10:40 -0800 From: Lucy yong To: "thomas.morin@orange.com" , "l3vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Index: AQHNzhK5h564BzE6bkaHtDbeR+m2h5ge2CTw Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:10:38 +0000 Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D44863BF3@dfweml505-mbx> References: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <60DEDD93F5E54B4AB55647B8B6C748390C023A@eusaamb109.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <60DEDD93F5E54B4AB55647B8B6C748390C023A@eusaamb109.ericsson.se> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.90.118] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:11:00 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCENCg0KQ2hlZXJzLA0KTHVjeQ0KDQoNCj4gLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0t LS0NCj4gRnJvbTogbDN2cG4tYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZyBbbWFpbHRvOmwzdnBuLWJvdW5jZXNA aWV0Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZg0KPiBPZiB0aG9tYXMubW9yaW5Ab3JhbmdlLmNvbQ0KPiBTZW50 OiBUaHVyc2RheSwgTm92ZW1iZXIgMjksIDIwMTIgMToxNSBBTQ0KPiBUbzogbDN2cG5AaWV0Zi5v cmcNCj4gU3ViamVjdDogUG9sbCBmb3IgYWRvcHRpb246IGRyYWZ0LXdpam5hbmRzLWwzdnBuLW1s ZHAtdnJmLWluLWJhbmQtDQo+IHNpZ25hbGluZy0wMQ0KPiANCj4gSGVsbG8gd29ya2luZyBncm91 cCwNCj4gDQo+IFRoaXMgZW1haWwgc3RhcnRzIGEgdHdvLXdlZWsgcG9sbCBvbiBhZG9wdGluZw0K PiBkcmFmdC13aWpuYW5kcy1sM3Zwbi1tbGRwLXZyZi1pbi1iYW5kLXNpZ25hbGluZy0wMSBbMV0u DQo+IA0KPiBQbGVhc2Ugc2VuZCBjb21tZW50cyB0byB0aGUgbGlzdCBhbmQgc3RhdGUgaWYgeW91 IHN1cHBvcnQgYWRvcHRpb24gb3INCj4gbm90IChpbiB0aGUgbGF0ZXIgY2FzZSwgcGxlYXNlIGFs c28gc3RhdGUgdGhlIHJlYXNvbnMpLg0KPiANCj4gVGhpcyBwb2xsIHJ1bnMgdW50aWwgRGVjZW1i ZXIgMTN0aC4NCj4gDQo+IA0KPiBDb2luY2lkZW50YWxseSwgd2UgYXJlIGFsc28gcG9sbGluZyBm b3Iga25vd2xlZGdlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdA0KPiBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQsIHRv IGVuc3VyZSB0aGF0IElQUiBoYXMgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4NCj4gY29tcGxpYW5jZSB3aXRo IElFVEYgSVBSIHJ1bGVzIChzZWUgUkZDcyAzOTc5LCA0ODc5LCAzNjY5IGFuZCA1Mzc4IGZvcg0K PiBtb3JlIGRldGFpbHMpLg0KPiANCj4gSWYgeW91IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYSBkb2N1bWVudCBh dXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IgcGxlYXNlIHJlc3BvbmQgdG8NCj4gdGhpcyBlbWFpbCB3aGV0 aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSByZWxldmFudCBJUFIuIFRoZSBkcmFmdA0K PiB3aWxsIG5vdCBiZSBhZG9wdGVkIHVudGlsIGEgcmVzcG9uc2UgaGFzIGJlZW4gcmVjZWl2ZWQg ZnJvbSBlYWNoIGF1dGhvcg0KPiBhbmQgY29udHJpYnV0b3IuDQo+IA0KPiBJZiB5b3UgYXJlIG9u IHRoZSBMM1ZQTiBXRyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QgYnV0IGFyZSBub3QgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGFuIGF1dGhv cg0KPiBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciwgdGhlbiBwbGVhc2UgZXhwbGljaXRseSByZXNwb25kIG9ubHkg aWYgeW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZg0KPiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgaGFzIG5vdCB5ZXQgYmVlbiBkaXNj bG9zZWQgaW4gY29uZm9ybWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIHJ1bGVzLg0KPiANCj4gVGhhbmsgeW91LA0K PiANCj4gTWFydGluICYgVGhvbWFzDQo+IGwzdnBuIGNoYWlycw0KPiANCj4gWzFdDQo+IGh0dHA6 Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LXdpam5hbmRzLWwzdnBuLW1sZHAtdnJmLWluLWJh bmQtDQo+IHNpZ25hbGluZy0wMQ0KPiBfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPiBfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPiANCj4gQ2UgbWVzc2FnZSBldCBz ZXMgcGllY2VzIGpvaW50ZXMgcGV1dmVudCBjb250ZW5pciBkZXMgaW5mb3JtYXRpb25zDQo+IGNv bmZpZGVudGllbGxlcyBvdSBwcml2aWxlZ2llZXMgZXQgbmUgZG9pdmVudCBkb25jIHBhcyBldHJl IGRpZmZ1c2VzLA0KPiBleHBsb2l0ZXMgb3UgY29waWVzIHNhbnMgYXV0b3Jpc2F0aW9uLiBTaSB2 b3VzIGF2ZXogcmVjdSBjZSBtZXNzYWdlIHBhcg0KPiBlcnJldXIsIHZldWlsbGV6IGxlIHNpZ25h bGVyIGEgbCdleHBlZGl0ZXVyIGV0IGxlIGRldHJ1aXJlIGFpbnNpIHF1ZQ0KPiBsZXMgcGllY2Vz IGpvaW50ZXMuIExlcyBtZXNzYWdlcyBlbGVjdHJvbmlxdWVzIGV0YW50IHN1c2NlcHRpYmxlcw0K PiBkJ2FsdGVyYXRpb24sIEZyYW5jZSBUZWxlY29tIC0gT3JhbmdlIGRlY2xpbmUgdG91dGUgcmVz cG9uc2FiaWxpdGUgc2kNCj4gY2UgbWVzc2FnZSBhIGV0ZSBhbHRlcmUsIGRlZm9ybWUgb3UgZmFs c2lmaWUuIE1lcmNpLg0KPiANCj4gVGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIGFuZCBpdHMgYXR0YWNobWVudHMgbWF5 IGNvbnRhaW4gY29uZmlkZW50aWFsIG9yIHByaXZpbGVnZWQNCj4gaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gdGhhdCBt YXkgYmUgcHJvdGVjdGVkIGJ5IGxhdzsgdGhleSBzaG91bGQgbm90IGJlDQo+IGRpc3RyaWJ1dGVk LCB1c2VkIG9yIGNvcGllZCB3aXRob3V0IGF1dGhvcmlzYXRpb24uDQo+IElmIHlvdSBoYXZlIHJl Y2VpdmVkIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgaW4gZXJyb3IsIHBsZWFzZSBub3RpZnkgdGhlIHNlbmRlciBhbmQN Cj4gZGVsZXRlIHRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBhbmQgaXRzIGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzLg0KPiBBcyBlbWFpbHMg bWF5IGJlIGFsdGVyZWQsIEZyYW5jZSBUZWxlY29tIC0gT3JhbmdlIGlzIG5vdCBsaWFibGUgZm9y DQo+IG1lc3NhZ2VzIHRoYXQgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIG1vZGlmaWVkLCBjaGFuZ2VkIG9yIGZhbHNpZmll ZC4NCj4gVGhhbmsgeW91Lg0KDQo= From linda.dunbar@huawei.com Tue Dec 18 08:45:48 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEE121F8991 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:45:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.168 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.169, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ey8wgrU6z--T for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:45:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F8C21F892E for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:45:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AMP69807; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:45:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:45:30 +0000 Received: from DFWEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.131) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:45:37 +0000 Received: from DFWEML505-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.124.31.100]) by dfweml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.131]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:45:30 -0800 From: Linda Dunbar To: Lucy yong , "thomas.morin@orange.com" , "l3vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 Thread-Index: AQHNzhK58KpMmkCnRYWzMaXfOvyopZge2CTwgAAJ0wA= Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:45:30 +0000 Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F6450DAFDB@dfweml505-mbx> References: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <60DEDD93F5E54B4AB55647B8B6C748390C023A@eusaamb109.ericsson.se> <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D44863BF3@dfweml505-mbx> In-Reply-To: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D44863BF3@dfweml505-mbx> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.135.137] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:45:48 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCwgDQoNCkxpbmRhDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gPiAtLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0t LQ0KPiA+IEZyb206IGwzdnBuLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmcgW21haWx0bzpsM3Zwbi1ib3VuY2Vz QGlldGYub3JnXSBPbg0KPiBCZWhhbGYNCj4gPiBPZiB0aG9tYXMubW9yaW5Ab3JhbmdlLmNvbQ0K PiA+IFNlbnQ6IFRodXJzZGF5LCBOb3ZlbWJlciAyOSwgMjAxMiAxOjE1IEFNDQo+ID4gVG86IGwz dnBuQGlldGYub3JnDQo+ID4gU3ViamVjdDogUG9sbCBmb3IgYWRvcHRpb246IGRyYWZ0LXdpam5h bmRzLWwzdnBuLW1sZHAtdnJmLWluLWJhbmQtDQo+ID4gc2lnbmFsaW5nLTAxDQo+ID4NCj4gPiBI ZWxsbyB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwLA0KPiA+DQo+ID4gVGhpcyBlbWFpbCBzdGFydHMgYSB0d28td2Vl ayBwb2xsIG9uIGFkb3B0aW5nDQo+ID4gZHJhZnQtd2lqbmFuZHMtbDN2cG4tbWxkcC12cmYtaW4t YmFuZC1zaWduYWxpbmctMDEgWzFdLg0KPiA+DQo+ID4gUGxlYXNlIHNlbmQgY29tbWVudHMgdG8g dGhlIGxpc3QgYW5kIHN0YXRlIGlmIHlvdSBzdXBwb3J0IGFkb3B0aW9uIG9yDQo+ID4gbm90IChp biB0aGUgbGF0ZXIgY2FzZSwgcGxlYXNlIGFsc28gc3RhdGUgdGhlIHJlYXNvbnMpLg0KPiA+DQo+ ID4gVGhpcyBwb2xsIHJ1bnMgdW50aWwgRGVjZW1iZXIgMTN0aC4NCj4gPg0KPiA+DQo+ID4gQ29p bmNpZGVudGFsbHksIHdlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBS IHRoYXQNCj4gPiBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQsIHRvIGVuc3VyZSB0aGF0IElQUiBoYXMg YmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4NCj4gPiBjb21wbGlhbmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBJUFIgcnVsZXMgKHNl ZSBSRkNzIDM5NzksIDQ4NzksIDM2NjkgYW5kIDUzNzgNCj4gZm9yDQo+ID4gbW9yZSBkZXRhaWxz KS4NCj4gPg0KPiA+IElmIHlvdSBhcmUgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGEgZG9jdW1lbnQgYXV0aG9yIG9yIGNv bnRyaWJ1dG9yIHBsZWFzZSByZXNwb25kDQo+IHRvDQo+ID4gdGhpcyBlbWFpbCB3aGV0aGVyIG9y IG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSByZWxldmFudCBJUFIuIFRoZQ0KPiBkcmFmdA0KPiA+ IHdpbGwgbm90IGJlIGFkb3B0ZWQgdW50aWwgYSByZXNwb25zZSBoYXMgYmVlbiByZWNlaXZlZCBm cm9tIGVhY2gNCj4gYXV0aG9yDQo+ID4gYW5kIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLg0KPiA+DQo+ID4gSWYgeW91 IGFyZSBvbiB0aGUgTDNWUE4gV0cgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0IGJ1dCBhcmUgbm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBh bg0KPiBhdXRob3INCj4gPiBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciwgdGhlbiBwbGVhc2UgZXhwbGljaXRseSBy ZXNwb25kIG9ubHkgaWYgeW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZQ0KPiBvZg0KPiA+IGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCBoYXMg bm90IHlldCBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbiBjb25mb3JtYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYNCj4gcnVsZXMu DQo+ID4NCj4gPiBUaGFuayB5b3UsDQo+ID4NCj4gPiBNYXJ0aW4gJiBUaG9tYXMNCj4gPiBsM3Zw biBjaGFpcnMNCj4gPg0KPiA+IFsxXQ0KPiA+IGh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2Ry YWZ0LXdpam5hbmRzLWwzdnBuLW1sZHAtdnJmLWluLWJhbmQtDQo+ID4gc2lnbmFsaW5nLTAxDQo+ ID4NCj4gX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj4gPiBfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPiA+DQo+ID4gQ2UgbWVzc2FnZSBldCBzZXMgcGllY2VzIGpv aW50ZXMgcGV1dmVudCBjb250ZW5pciBkZXMgaW5mb3JtYXRpb25zDQo+ID4gY29uZmlkZW50aWVs bGVzIG91IHByaXZpbGVnaWVlcyBldCBuZSBkb2l2ZW50IGRvbmMgcGFzIGV0cmUgZGlmZnVzZXMs DQo+ID4gZXhwbG9pdGVzIG91IGNvcGllcyBzYW5zIGF1dG9yaXNhdGlvbi4gU2kgdm91cyBhdmV6 IHJlY3UgY2UgbWVzc2FnZQ0KPiBwYXINCj4gPiBlcnJldXIsIHZldWlsbGV6IGxlIHNpZ25hbGVy IGEgbCdleHBlZGl0ZXVyIGV0IGxlIGRldHJ1aXJlIGFpbnNpIHF1ZQ0KPiA+IGxlcyBwaWVjZXMg am9pbnRlcy4gTGVzIG1lc3NhZ2VzIGVsZWN0cm9uaXF1ZXMgZXRhbnQgc3VzY2VwdGlibGVzDQo+ ID4gZCdhbHRlcmF0aW9uLCBGcmFuY2UgVGVsZWNvbSAtIE9yYW5nZSBkZWNsaW5lIHRvdXRlIHJl c3BvbnNhYmlsaXRlIHNpDQo+ID4gY2UgbWVzc2FnZSBhIGV0ZSBhbHRlcmUsIGRlZm9ybWUgb3Ug ZmFsc2lmaWUuIE1lcmNpLg0KPiA+DQo+ID4gVGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIGFuZCBpdHMgYXR0YWNobWVu dHMgbWF5IGNvbnRhaW4gY29uZmlkZW50aWFsIG9yDQo+IHByaXZpbGVnZWQNCj4gPiBpbmZvcm1h dGlvbiB0aGF0IG1heSBiZSBwcm90ZWN0ZWQgYnkgbGF3OyB0aGV5IHNob3VsZCBub3QgYmUNCj4g PiBkaXN0cmlidXRlZCwgdXNlZCBvciBjb3BpZWQgd2l0aG91dCBhdXRob3Jpc2F0aW9uLg0KPiA+ IElmIHlvdSBoYXZlIHJlY2VpdmVkIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgaW4gZXJyb3IsIHBsZWFzZSBub3RpZnkg dGhlIHNlbmRlcg0KPiBhbmQNCj4gPiBkZWxldGUgdGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIGFuZCBpdHMgYXR0YWNo bWVudHMuDQo+ID4gQXMgZW1haWxzIG1heSBiZSBhbHRlcmVkLCBGcmFuY2UgVGVsZWNvbSAtIE9y YW5nZSBpcyBub3QgbGlhYmxlIGZvcg0KPiA+IG1lc3NhZ2VzIHRoYXQgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIG1vZGlm aWVkLCBjaGFuZ2VkIG9yIGZhbHNpZmllZC4NCj4gPiBUaGFuayB5b3UuDQoNCg== From lufang@cisco.com Tue Dec 18 17:41:27 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EDE1F0CDF for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:41:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.301, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NZiqWmnG4FNW for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:41:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B731F041A for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:41:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=39929; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1355881286; x=1357090886; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=P8J0N3yvONcSs5qIxltvTzz0hb9D96EBUN/vIBe4VfU=; b=SsEhLJh0ZWPF9Sv1z04MB7gFGkjGeXycnPSfjGqqxPuexB1yWOBi15vQ iB7owvmvaW3PrF7lhpT/rijy4czGFn9nEG0w4RxnCGLCaTRFqcNPs4u4K 2/ev6IPeefWpx59iTAYCaKjfAxg93ubwIQAOMIRp9QGKNKDVPnYbCUGiL g=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuwFAI4a0VCtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABFgkmFDaQ6iQsBiREWc4IeAQEBBC0+CQUSAQgRAQIBAgsWAQY5FAMGCAEBBAENBQgTh2YDDwyqMY4Si2Bpg2JhA5cmjyyCZw2CIg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,313,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="151443511" Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2012 01:41:25 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBJ1fPoB025183 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 19 Dec 2012 01:41:25 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.7.87]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:41:24 -0600 From: "Luyuan Fang (lufang)" To: Lucy yong , "David Ward (wardd)" , "Rex Fernando (rex)" , "mnapierala@att.com" , "nabil.bitar@verizon.com" , "Dhananjaya Rao (dhrao)" Subject: Re: comment on draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-framework-01 Thread-Topic: comment on draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-framework-01 Thread-Index: Ac23hctPiQHvGKzWS4ms8LiAALc6ogmDIjSA Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 01:41:23 +0000 Message-ID: <0DB8F45437AB844CBB5102F807A0AD93101D2D55@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D4482B490@dfweml505-mbx> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010 x-originating-ip: [10.82.235.135] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0DB8F45437AB844CBB5102F807A0AD93101D2D55xmbrcdx03ciscoc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "l3vpn@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 01:41:28 -0000 --_000_0DB8F45437AB844CBB5102F807A0AD93101D2D55xmbrcdx03ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Lucy, Thanks for your review and comments. Please see my comments in-line. From: Lucy yong > Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 8:40 AM To: Luyuan Fang >, "David Ward (w= ardd)" >, Rex Fernando >, Maria Napierala >, Nabil Bitar >, "Dhananjaya Rao (dhrao)" > Cc: "l3vpn@ietf.org" > Subject: comment on draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-framework-01 Hi Co-authors on this draft, I read the document and have some comments and suggestions. 1) The intention of the draft is to extend L3VPN PE to a vPE on end device= s in DC. We need to distinct about two cases clearly in the framework, one= is that a L3VPN applies to intra DC; another is a L3VPN in DC connecting L= 3VPN in WAN which connects to Enterprise site. We can fully describe vPE fu= nction in the first case. the second case is about L3VPN interworking acros= s different underlying networks, which is orthogonal to vPE functions. The = draft seems mix two together. In the nvo3 use case draft, we have clearly d= escribed two use cases. (draft-mity-nov3-use-case-04) [LF] vPE can be in any network or compute devices. The following was presented in Atlanta IETF 85: Virtual PE (vPE): A PE sof= tware instance which can reside in any network or compute devices. A common= place for vPE can be a service network end device, e.g., a server which su= pports multiple client/application Virtual Machines (VMs), or a Top-of-Rack= switch (ToR) in the Data Center. Another example can be a service node in = a 3GPP network. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/85/materials.html (under Routing/L3VP= N). We are updating our draft to make this clear. 2) Text for the key requirement in section 1.2 : 3) Support end-to-end L3VPN connectivity, e.g. L3VPN can start from a service network end device, connect to a corresponding L3VPN in the WAN, and terminate in another service network end device. Not sure why this is the key requirement. If this is to allow end-to-end= L3VPN span across multiple DC sites, DC providers may prefer to use WAN to= interconnect DC underlying networks first. Then they can create end-to-end= L3VPN (overlay) without WAN operator interferes. This is, in turn, to beco= me the first case in two case mentioned in the first comment. IMO: the key = requirements is to support case 1 and case 2 in my first comments. [LF] Overlay without WAN operator's/SPs' involvement is not these SPs' inte= rest. 3) What does the true network abstraction mean? [LF] The text in our draft is "true network virtualization and network abst= raction." We can put a comma before "and" to avoid confusion. 4) The third paragraph in section 2.1. comment: if vPE allows L3VPN contro= l plane and forwarding function residing on different physical devices, a p= rotocol is necessary between control plane and forwarding entity. This is a= significant change for L3VPN PE function. The draft should point out. [LF] No, vPE does not change L3VPN function definitions, though it has impa= ct to device implementation. We can point this out explicitly. The protocol= s used between control plane and the forwarder can be existing IETF protoco= ls, for example, end-system draft used XMPP. The VPN functions from the us= er point of view are not changed. 5) The fourth paragraph in section 2.1. Comment: When vPE and VM on one en= d device, it simplifies the control plane and data plane functions between = PE and CE in RFC4364. The draft should clarity that. [LF] It is implementation matter. Think the L3VPN forwarder sitting on a se= rver as a vitalized linecard somewhere away from the main chassis. And, vPE= is a virtualized PE, not a CE. 6) Since we need to decouple the underlying network and the overlay networ= k, i.e. end-to-end L3VPN in this document, modeling a virtualized service n= etwork in figure 1 to include Gateway PE, Transport Device and vPE in end d= evice is misleading. The virtualized service network should not include Tra= nsport device at all. [LF] L3VPN is an overlay technology, PE/ASBR/RR are all components of L3VPN= . Transporting L3VPN packets involves transport LSP (labeled switched path = built by using LDP, or RSVP-TE, or MPLSoIP/GRE, etc.). Try not to think the= service provided directly by SP WAN networks are not virtual services, the= y are, and they have existed for a long time. 7) Again, this model should be generic to show that a virtualized service = network may include vPEs, PE, or Gateway PE to cover both case 1 and case 2= in my first comment. 8) Again, this model architecture should separate DC physical network and = DC virtualized service network like the nvo3 architecture model in the nvo3= framework draft. This will let you describe a WAN L3VPN that may connect t= o DC underlying network and DC virtualized service network. Please see the = draft-hy-nvo3-vpn-gap-analysis draft. [LF] L3VPN is a mature technology, not at the same development stage as nv= o3 where Framework/Requirements for CP/DP/MP req. are still being defined, = and many folks in nvo3 are trying to learn from each other on the technolog= ies they were not familiar with. In contrast, making extension to L3VPN sol= utions is just a continued effort, simple as that. 9) If vPE can reside on different physical devices as described in the dra= ft, using a VRF block to describe the VPN entity on a vPE is not proper bec= ause you can=92t split them further. So Figure 2 need to separate the VRF i= nto two entities and describe that two entities may be on one end device or= may on separated devices. IMO: this is significant different from the L3VP= N in RFC4364. 10) Figure 3 can only express option A in RFC4364. Option B does no= t use gateway PE, it only uses ASBR. ASBR is very different from a PE. Alth= ough in option B, L3VPN control plane can advertise the VPN routes from a P= E in an AS to the PE in another AS. It does not mean that the P nodes in an= AS know how to route to the PE in another AS. This will be an issue when u= se IP GRE tunnels. To use MPLS LSP tunnel, option B requires pre-build MPLS= LSP tunnel between two PEs that belong to different ASes, which requires t= wo SPs pre-provisioning process that may not apply to here. The framework n= eed to clarify that. In addition, WAN may use MPLS LSP tunnel and DC may us= e IP based tunnel. [LF] Many experts corrected this already. We deployed Option B in Jan. 2003 when I was working in AT&T at the time. A= nd we worked/deployed all three options in the field. L3VPN WG is long established WG, so our draft does not provide intro. to PE= /ASBR/RR, nor how each Inter-AS option works. Here is some quick recap on Inter-AS options: 1) Option A: use back-to-back VRFs, the ASBR from one AS is treating the AS= BR in the other AS as a CE. 2) Option B: use e-BGP to exchange VPN routes b= etween the ASBRs, these ASBRs still need to maintain VRFs, no IGP info exch= ange between the ASes. 3) Option C: use e-BGP to exchange VPN routes direct= ly via RRs of the two ASes, no VRFs are needed on ASBRs, IGP info must be = exchanged between the ASes. In practice, Option C may be used for Inter-AS connections within a single = SP, but it is strongly recommended not to use Option C for Inter-Provider c= onnections because of security concerns. Option B is viewed as more practic= al in general for DC/Cloud connections by many SPs. 11) In section 3, regarding to Centralized routing controller, it i= s good to enable SDN approach in L3VPN. However, RFC4364 does not enable SD= N approach. This is regardless use of vPE or PE. This is significant change= to the L3VPN in my opinion. 12) As the result, the framework contains significant extension or = changes to existing L3VPN. We should require the WG recharter to include th= is pieces first. [LF] That is upto the Chairs/ADs to decide. Personally, I see the this work fit into the current charter quite fine acc= ording to the current charter definition. http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/l3vpn/charter/ Thanks, Luyuan Cheers, Lucy --_000_0DB8F45437AB844CBB5102F807A0AD93101D2D55xmbrcdx03ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Lucy,=

Thanks f= or your review and comments. 
Please s= ee my comments in-line.

From: Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 8= :40 AM
To: Luyuan Fang <lufang@cisco.com>, "David Ward (wardd)&quo= t; <wardd@cisco.com>, Rex Fern= ando <rex@cisco.com>, Maria Napierala <mnapierala@att.com= >, Nabil Bitar <nabil.bita= r@verizon.com>, "Dhananjaya Rao (dhrao)" <dhrao@cisco.com>
Cc: "l3vpn@ietf.org" <l3v= pn@ietf.org>
Subject: comment on draft-fang-l3vp= n-virtual-pe-framework-01

Hi Co-a= uthors on this draft,

&n= bsp;

I read = the document and have some comments and suggestions.

&n= bsp;

1)  =  

2)     service network end device,= connect to a corresponding L3VPN in the

   Not sure why this is the key requirement. If this is to= allow end-to-end L3VPN span across multiple DC sites, DC providers may pre= fer to use WAN to interconnect DC underlying networks first. Then they can create end-to-end L3VPN (overlay) without WAN operato= r interferes. This is, in turn, to become the first case in two case mentio= ned in the first comment. IMO: the key requirements is to support case 1 an= d case 2 in my first comments.

[LF] Overlay= without WAN operator's/SPs' involvement is not these SPs' interest.

 

3)  What does the true network abstraction mean?
[LF] The text in our d= raft is "true network virtualization and network abstraction." We= can put a comma before "and" to avoid confusion.

 

4)  The third paragraph in section 2.1. comment: if vPE allo= ws L3VPN control plane and forwarding function residing on different physic= al devices, a protocol is necessary between control plane and forwarding entity. This is a significant change = for L3VPN PE function. The draft should point out.

[LF] No,= vPE does not change L3VPN function definitions, though it has impact to de= vice implementation. We can point this out explicitly. The protocols used b= etween control plane and the forwarder can be existing IETF protocols, for example, end-system draft used XMPP. &= nbsp;The VPN functions from the user point of view are not changed. 

5)  The fourth paragraph in section 2.1. Comment: When vPE a= nd VM on one end device, it simplifies the control plane and data plane fun= ctions between PE and CE in RFC4364. The draft should clarity that.

[LF] It is implementation= matter. Think the L3VPN forwarder sitting on a server as a vitalized linec= ard somewhere away from the main chassis. And, vPE is a virtualized PE, not= a CE.

 

6)  Since we need to decouple the underlying network and the= overlay network, i.e. end-to-end L3VPN in this document, modeling a virtua= lized service network in figure 1 to include Gateway PE, Transport Device and vPE in end device is misleadin= g. The virtualized service network should not include Transport device at a= ll.

[LF] L3VPN is an overlay = technology, PE/ASBR/RR are all components of L3VPN. Transporting L3VPN pack= ets involves transport LSP (labeled switched path built by using LDP, or RS= VP-TE, or MPLSoIP/GRE, etc.). Try not to think the service provided directly by SP WAN networks are not virt= ual services, they are, and they have existed for a long time. 

 

7)  Again, this model should be generic to show that a virtu= alized service network may include vPEs, PE, or Gateway PE to cover both ca= se 1 and case 2 in my first comment.

 

8)  Again, this model architecture should separate DC physic= al network and DC virtualized service network like the nvo3 architecture mo= del in the nvo3 framework draft. This will let you describe a WAN L3VPN that may connect to DC underlying networ= k and DC virtualized service network. Please see the draft-hy-nvo3-vpn-gap-= analysis draft.

[LF]  L3VPN is a = mature technology, not at the same development stage as nvo3 where Framewor= k/Requirements for CP/DP/MP req. are still being defined, and many folks in nvo3 are trying to learn from each other = on the technologies they were not familiar with. In contrast, making extens= ion to L3VPN solutions is just a continued effort, simple as that.

&nb= sp;

9)  If vPE can reside on different physical devices as descr= ibed in the draft, using a VRF block to describe the VPN entity on a vPE is= not proper because you can=92t split them further. So Figure 2 need to separate the VRF into two entities and d= escribe that two entities may be on one end device or may on separated devi= ces. IMO: this is significant different from the L3VPN in RFC4364.

=  

10)       &nbs= p; Figure 3 can only express option A in RFC4364. Option B = does not use gateway PE, it only uses ASBR. ASBR is very different from a P= E. Although in option B, L3VPN control plane can advertise the VPN routes from a PE in an AS to the PE in another= AS. It does not mean that the P nodes in an AS know how to route to the PE= in another AS. This will be an issue when use IP GRE tunnels. To use MPLS = LSP tunnel, option B requires pre-build MPLS LSP tunnel between two PEs that belong to different ASes, which requi= res two SPs pre-provisioning process that may not apply to here. The framew= ork need to clarify that. In addition, WAN may use MPLS LSP tunnel and DC m= ay use IP based tunnel.

[LF] Many experts correct= ed this already. 
We deployed Option B in J= an. 2003 when I was working in AT&T at the time. And we worked/deployed= all three options in the field.
L3VPN WG is long establis= hed WG, so our draft does not provide intro. to PE/ASBR/RR, nor how each In= ter-AS option works.
Here is some quick recap = on Inter-AS options: 
1) Option A: use back-to-= back VRFs, the ASBR from one AS is treating the ASBR in the other AS as a C= E. 2) Option B: use e-BGP to exchange VPN routes between the ASBRs, these A= SBRs still need to maintain VRFs, no IGP info exchange between the ASes. 3) Option C: use e-BGP to exch= ange VPN routes directly via RRs of the two ASes, no VRFs are nee= ded on ASBRs,  IGP info must be exchanged between the ASes. 
In practice, Option C may= be used for Inter-AS connections within a single SP, but it is strongly re= commended not to use Option C for Inter-Provider connections because of sec= urity concerns. Option B is viewed as more practical in general for DC/Cloud connections by many SPs.

&nb= sp;

11)       &nbs= p; In section 3, regarding to Centralized routing controlle= r, it is good to enable SDN approach in L3VPN. However, RFC4364 does not en= able SDN approach. This is regardless use of vPE or PE. This is significant change to the L3VPN in my opinion.

 

=  

12)       &nbs= p; As the result, the framework contains significant extens= ion or changes to existing L3VPN. We should require the WG recharter to inc= lude this pieces first.

[LF] That is upto the Chairs/ADs to decide. 
Personally, I see the this work fit into the current charter quite fin= e according to the current charter definition.

Thanks,
Luyuan

Cheers,

Lucy

 

 

 --_000_0DB8F45437AB844CBB5102F807A0AD93101D2D55xmbrcdx03ciscoc_-- From lucy.yong@huawei.com Tue Dec 18 17:42:05 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0347D21E8034 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:42:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.261 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.261 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.262, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W4wbZRP8JF8j for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:42:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156EB21E8030 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:42:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AMP92708; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 01:42:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 01:41:53 +0000 Received: from DFWEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:42:02 +0800 Received: from DFWEML505-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.124.31.100]) by dfweml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.203]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:41:55 -0800 From: Lucy yong To: Martin Vigoureux , L3VPN Subject: RE: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Thread-Index: AQHN0iv2P9hDdADknEim6r0O+Huqmpgfb6iw Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 01:41:55 +0000 Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D44863F13@dfweml505-mbx> References: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.90.118] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 01:42:05 -0000 Support! Lucy > -----Original Message----- > From: l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Martin Vigoureux > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 8:29 AM > To: L3VPN > Subject: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all >=20 > Hello Working Group, >=20 > This e-mail starts a two-week poll on adopting > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all-00 > as WG document >=20 > This work results from a merge of previous drafts on the topic. >=20 > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). >=20 > This poll runs until December 18th. >=20 > Note that, Thomas being a co-author on this draft, I'll judge consensus > to adopt the document. >=20 > Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 > and 5378 for more details). >=20 > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft > will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author > and contributor. >=20 > If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author > or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of > any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >=20 > Thank you, >=20 > Martin (as L3VPN co-chair) From praveen.muley@alcatel-lucent.com Tue Dec 18 18:03:03 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1CD21F869E for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:03:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.649 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z0PPFe86gTEG for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:03:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from smail3.alcatel.fr (smail3.alcatel.fr [62.23.212.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F5C21F8694 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:03:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.64]) by smail3.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id qBJ22x5F030189 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 03:02:59 +0100 Received: from US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (135.5.2.35) by FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (135.120.45.64) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 03:02:59 +0100 Received: from US70TWXCHMBA10.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.4.41]) by US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.35]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:02:57 -0500 From: "Muley, Praveen V (Praveen)" To: "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN)" , L3VPN Subject: RE: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption of draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all Thread-Index: AQHN0ivSSArTb1cjr0q3ckt2/XeqKZgJcQcAgBYELLA= Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 02:02:56 +0000 Message-ID: <22069265D1B36949926E9422EBF3B8811728521E@US70TWXCHMBA10.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> References: <50BE08C9.9040702@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.16] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.83 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 02:03:04 -0000 =20 Not aware of IPR On 04/12/12 15:29, "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN)" wrote: >Hello Working Group, > >This e-mail starts a two-week poll on adopting=20 >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-l3vpn-mvpn-extranet-all-00 >as WG document > >This work results from a merge of previous drafts on the topic. > >Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or=20 >not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > >This poll runs until December 18th. > >Note that, Thomas being a co-author on this draft, I'll judge consensus=20 >to adopt the document. > >Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that=20 >applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in=20 >compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for=20 >more details). > >If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to=20 >this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft=20 >will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author=20 >and contributor. > >If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author=20 >or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of=20 >any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > >Thank you, > >Martin (as L3VPN co-chair) From thomas.morin@orange.com Thu Dec 20 07:16:41 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32F721F88B2 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:16:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.148 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1BArmC34TxfV for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:16:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F365C21F88AE for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:16:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from omfedm05.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.1]) by omfedm11.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 8AA313B473D; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:16:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.183]) by omfedm05.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 63F6035C06F; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:16:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::cc7e:e40b:42ef:164e]) by PEXCVZYH02.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:16:39 +0100 From: To: "l3vpn@ietf.org" , "draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 --> adopted ! Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 --> adopted ! Thread-Index: AQHN3sUC/TIg09wdq0uWYjOiG5/6BA== Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:16:38 +0000 Message-ID: <8242_1356016599_50D32BD7_8242_473_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D07152B4E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> In-Reply-To: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 x-originating-ip: [10.197.38.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <09B35994B28BE14EBB3625D24F2A557B@adroot.infra.ftgroup> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.10.24.110314 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:16:41 -0000 SGVsbG8sDQoNClRoaXMgY2FsbCBmb3IgYWRvcHRpb24gaXMgY2xvc2VkIGFuZCB3ZSBoYXZlIGNv bnNlbnN1cyB0byBhZG9wdA0KZHJhZnQtd2lqbmFuZHMtbDN2cG4tbWxkcC12cmYtaW4tYmFuZC1z aWduYWxpbmctMDEgYXMgYSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGRvY3VtZW50Lg0KDQpBdXRob3JzLCBjYW4g eW91IHBsZWFzZSByZXN1Ym1pdCBhcyBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWwzdnBuLW1sZHAtdnJmLWluLWJhbmQt c2lnbmFsaW5nLTAwID8NCg0KVGhhbmtzLA0KDQotVGhvbWFzDQoNCg0KDQp0aG9tYXMubW9yaW5A b3JhbmdlLmNvbSA6DQo+IEhlbGxvIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAsDQo+DQo+IFRoaXMgZW1haWwgc3Rh cnRzIGEgdHdvLXdlZWsgcG9sbCBvbiBhZG9wdGluZw0KPiBkcmFmdC13aWpuYW5kcy1sM3Zwbi1t bGRwLXZyZi1pbi1iYW5kLXNpZ25hbGluZy0wMSBbMV0uDQo+DQo+IFBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIGNvbW1l bnRzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGFuZCBzdGF0ZSBpZiB5b3Ugc3VwcG9ydCBhZG9wdGlvbiBvcg0KPiBu b3QgKGluIHRoZSBsYXRlciBjYXNlLCBwbGVhc2UgYWxzbyBzdGF0ZSB0aGUgcmVhc29ucykuDQo+ DQo+IFRoaXMgcG9sbCBydW5zIHVudGlsIERlY2VtYmVyIDEzdGguDQo+DQo+DQo+IENvaW5jaWRl bnRhbGx5LCB3ZSBhcmUgYWxzbyBwb2xsaW5nIGZvciBrbm93bGVkZ2Ugb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0 DQo+IGFwcGxpZXMgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdCwgdG8gZW5zdXJlIHRoYXQgSVBSIGhhcyBiZWVuIGRp c2Nsb3NlZCBpbg0KPiBjb21wbGlhbmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBJUFIgcnVsZXMgKHNlZSBSRkNzIDM5 NzksIDQ4NzksIDM2NjkNCj4gYW5kIDUzNzggZm9yIG1vcmUgZGV0YWlscykuDQo+DQo+IElmIHlv dSBhcmUgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGEgZG9jdW1lbnQgYXV0aG9yIG9yIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yIHBsZWFzZSBy ZXNwb25kIHRvDQo+IHRoaXMgZW1haWwgd2hldGhlciBvciBub3QgeW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBh bnkgcmVsZXZhbnQgSVBSLiBUaGUgZHJhZnQNCj4gd2lsbCBub3QgYmUgYWRvcHRlZCB1bnRpbCBh IHJlc3BvbnNlIGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlY2VpdmVkIGZyb20gZWFjaCBhdXRob3INCj4gYW5kIGNvbnRy aWJ1dG9yLg0KPg0KPiBJZiB5b3UgYXJlIG9uIHRoZSBMM1ZQTiBXRyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QgYnV0 IGFyZSBub3QgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGFuIGF1dGhvcg0KPiBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciwgdGhlbiBwbGVh c2UgZXhwbGljaXRseSByZXNwb25kIG9ubHkgaWYgeW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZg0KPiBhbnkgSVBS IHRoYXQgaGFzIG5vdCB5ZXQgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29uZm9ybWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRG IHJ1bGVzLg0KPg0KPiBUaGFuayB5b3UsDQo+DQo+IE1hcnRpbiAmIFRob21hcw0KPiBsM3ZwbiBj aGFpcnMNCj4NCj4gWzFdDQo+IGh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LXdpam5h bmRzLWwzdnBuLW1sZHAtdnJmLWluLWJhbmQtc2lnbmFsaW5nLTAxDQoKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwoKQ2UgbWVz c2FnZSBldCBzZXMgcGllY2VzIGpvaW50ZXMgcGV1dmVudCBjb250ZW5pciBkZXMgaW5mb3JtYXRp b25zIGNvbmZpZGVudGllbGxlcyBvdSBwcml2aWxlZ2llZXMgZXQgbmUgZG9pdmVudCBkb25jCnBh cyBldHJlIGRpZmZ1c2VzLCBleHBsb2l0ZXMgb3UgY29waWVzIHNhbnMgYXV0b3Jpc2F0aW9uLiBT aSB2b3VzIGF2ZXogcmVjdSBjZSBtZXNzYWdlIHBhciBlcnJldXIsIHZldWlsbGV6IGxlIHNpZ25h bGVyCmEgbCdleHBlZGl0ZXVyIGV0IGxlIGRldHJ1aXJlIGFpbnNpIHF1ZSBsZXMgcGllY2VzIGpv aW50ZXMuIExlcyBtZXNzYWdlcyBlbGVjdHJvbmlxdWVzIGV0YW50IHN1c2NlcHRpYmxlcyBkJ2Fs dGVyYXRpb24sCkZyYW5jZSBUZWxlY29tIC0gT3JhbmdlIGRlY2xpbmUgdG91dGUgcmVzcG9uc2Fi aWxpdGUgc2kgY2UgbWVzc2FnZSBhIGV0ZSBhbHRlcmUsIGRlZm9ybWUgb3UgZmFsc2lmaWUuIE1l cmNpLgoKVGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIGFuZCBpdHMgYXR0YWNobWVudHMgbWF5IGNvbnRhaW4gY29uZmlk ZW50aWFsIG9yIHByaXZpbGVnZWQgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gdGhhdCBtYXkgYmUgcHJvdGVjdGVkIGJ5 IGxhdzsKdGhleSBzaG91bGQgbm90IGJlIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGVkLCB1c2VkIG9yIGNvcGllZCB3aXRo b3V0IGF1dGhvcmlzYXRpb24uCklmIHlvdSBoYXZlIHJlY2VpdmVkIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgaW4gZXJy b3IsIHBsZWFzZSBub3RpZnkgdGhlIHNlbmRlciBhbmQgZGVsZXRlIHRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBhbmQg aXRzIGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzLgpBcyBlbWFpbHMgbWF5IGJlIGFsdGVyZWQsIEZyYW5jZSBUZWxlY29t IC0gT3JhbmdlIGlzIG5vdCBsaWFibGUgZm9yIG1lc3NhZ2VzIHRoYXQgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIG1vZGlm aWVkLCBjaGFuZ2VkIG9yIGZhbHNpZmllZC4KVGhhbmsgeW91LgoK From internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu Dec 20 07:32:36 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F8421F88C6; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:32:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.529 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.529 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.070, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RsfwFWzkwwVU; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:32:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E271721F862B; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:32:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-00.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.37 Message-ID: <20121220153235.25273.87793.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:32:35 -0800 Cc: l3vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:32:36 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 3 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : Multipoint Label Distribution Protocol In-Band Signaling= in a VRF Context Author(s) : IJsbrand Wijnands Paul Hitchen Nicolai Leymann Wim Henderickx Arkadiy Gulko Filename : draft-ietf-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-00.txt Pages : 13 Date : 2012-12-20 Abstract: Sometimes an IP multicast distribution tree (MDT) traverses both MPLS-enabled and non-MPLS-enabled regions of a network. Typically the MDT begins and ends in non-MPLS regions, but travels through an MPLS region. In such cases, it can be useful to begin building the MDT as a pure IP MDT, then convert it to an MPLS Multipoint LSP (Label Switched Path) when it enters an MPLS-enabled region, and then convert it back to a pure IP MDT when it enters a non-MPLS-enabled region. Other documents specify the procedures for building such a hybrid MDT, using Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) in the non- MPLS region of the network, and using Multipoint Extensions to Label Distribution Protocol (mLDP) in the MPLS region. This document extends those procedures to handle the case where the link connecting the two regions is a "Virtual Routing and Forwarding Table" (VRF) link, as defined in the "BGP IP/MPLS VPN" specifications. However, this document is primarily aimed at particular use cases where VRFs are used to support multicast applications other than Multicast VPN. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-00 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From ice@cisco.com Thu Dec 20 07:51:34 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5339B21F9099 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:51:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tyQ3wo-6asSZ for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:51:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC4E21F902B for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:51:32 -0800 (PST) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBKFZ7OZ003140; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:35:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from ams-iwijnand-8719.cisco.com (ams-iwijnand-8719.cisco.com [10.55.191.154]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBKFZ71C019978; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:35:07 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: Poll for adoption: draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 --> adopted ! From: IJsbrand Wijnands In-Reply-To: <8242_1356016599_50D32BD7_8242_473_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D07152B4E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:35:06 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20841553-401B-4A2C-9A5A-FCEFAAA9EE5E@cisco.com> References: <2286_1354180487_50B72787_2286_43_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D071169C5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <8242_1356016599_50D32BD7_8242_473_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D07152B4E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Cc: "draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling@tools.ietf.org" , "l3vpn@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:51:34 -0000 Hi Thomas, > Authors, can you please resubmit as = draft-ietf-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-00 ? Done. Thx! Ice. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > -Thomas >=20 >=20 >=20 > thomas.morin@orange.com : >> Hello working group, >>=20 >> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >> draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01 [1]. >>=20 >> Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or >> not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). >>=20 >> This poll runs until December 13th. >>=20 >>=20 >> Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that >> applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in >> compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 >> and 5378 for more details). >>=20 >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond = to >> this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The = draft >> will not be adopted until a response has been received from each = author >> and contributor. >>=20 >> If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an = author >> or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware = of >> any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF = rules. >>=20 >> Thank you, >>=20 >> Martin & Thomas >> l3vpn chairs >>=20 >> [1] >> = http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wijnands-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling= -01 >=20 > = __________________________________________________________________________= _______________________________________________ >=20 > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations = confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez = recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les = messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a = ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >=20 > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or = privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and = delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for = messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. >=20 >=20