Subject: password policy I-D

From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:50:35 -0700

I notice that the revised I-D, intended for publication on
the Standard Track, still contains a normative reference to
an Informational RFC (2307).  This would have be corrected.

I also note that 'Proposed Standard' appears on each page
in the header.  This I find this misleading and inappropriate.
I suggest that the first page state:
Intended Category: Standard Track
and/or an appropriate statement in the Status of the Memo
section.

I will defer a more detailed review for another day...

Kurt