Subject: [lemonade] New Liaison Statement, "OMA LS_0082 Liaison on Mobile E-Mail"

From: Dean Willis(OMA) <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 20:23:40 -0500

Title: OMA LS_0082 Liaison on Mobile E-Mail
Submission Date: 2006-02-12
URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/liaison_detail.cgi?detail_id=198 

From: Dean Willis(OMA) <[email-masked]>
To: IETF LEMONADE WG([email-masked], [email-masked])
Cc: [email-masked]
Ted Hardie <[email-masked]>
Scott Hollenbeck <[email-masked]>
Reponse Contact: [email-masked]
Technical Contact: [email-masked]
Purpose: For information 
Body: 1 Overview 

This liaison is in response to specific questions raised in a liaison from IETF LEMONADE in  
OMA-MEM-2006-0023-ILS-fromIETF-on-LEMONADE-Profile. 

2 Proposal 

OMA MWG-MEM thanks IETF LEMONADE for their consideration of our previous liaison.  We understand, and will take into consideration, your comments. 

However, we have the following additional comments to your questions: 

1. (on your question 2)  MWG-MEM has not yet considered this and thanks IETF LEMONADE for bringing 
this to our attention.  As a result, we will study the possibility of a shorter list that is mandatory for the MEM enabler (and likely solicit the advice of the OMA STI group).  We will provide IETF LEMONADE an update on this after our next meeting.  

2. (on your question 4)  According to the MWG-MEM RD, only notification and send/receive roundtrip delay is of concern at this point.  We will inform IETF LEMONADE if these requirements change. 

3. (on your question 6)  According to the MWG-MEM RD, message recall is still a requirement.  Specifically, that the client be able to request a recall and that success/failure be indicated back.  MWG-MEM will consider IETF LEMONADE’s input in its realization of this requirement and will let IETF know if any further work is requested. Note that work continues on the MEM architecture document (AD).  OMA MWG-MEM intends to continue to provide detailed updates of the Mobile e-mail enabler related activities as our work progresses. OMA MWG-MEM will hold its next meeting on April 3-7 in Vancouver, Canada. 

3 Requested Action(s) 
We request the IETF LEMONADE Working Group to consider and accept these comments.   
4 Conclusion OMA MWG-MEM SWG wishes to thank the IETF LEMONADE WG for its response to OMA MWG-MEM’s previous liaison and for the analysis and feedback they provided regarding the draft OMA Mobile Email RD and AD.
 
OMA MWG-MEM looks forward to continued collaboration on these matters with the IETF LEMONADE WG.  Finally, OMA MWG-MEM wishes to thank the IETF LEMONADE WG for its kind consideration of this liaison.
Attachment(s):
     LS_0082 on Mobile E-Mail (https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file272.pdf)

_______________________________________________
lemonade mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade