Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-03.txt

From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 15:06:55 +0000

Qin -

Thanx for addressing my comments - and for the update regarding PCE WG position.

The new version looks good to me.

   Les

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lsr <[email-masked]> On Behalf Of Qin Wu
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 11:26 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-
> 03.txt
> 
> v-03 is posted to address additional comments from Les
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-
> support-03
> Thanks Les for proposed change.
> 
> -Qin
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Lsr [mailto:[email-masked]] 代表 [email-masked]
> 发送时间: 2019年11月1日 14:24
> 收件人: [email-masked]
> 抄送: [email-masked]
> 主题: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-03.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE
> discovery
>         Authors         : Diego R. Lopez
>                           Qin Wu
>                           Dhruv Dhody
>                           Michael Wang
>                           Daniel King
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-03.txt
> 	Pages           : 9
> 	Date            : 2019-10-31
> 
> Abstract:
>    When a Path Computation Element (PCE) is a Label Switching Router
>    (LSR) participating in the Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP), or even a
>    server participating in IGP, its presence and path computation
>    capabilities can be advertised using IGP flooding.  The IGP
>    extensions for PCE discovery (RFC 5088 and RFC 5089) define a method
>    to advertise path computation capabilities using IGP flooding for
>    OSPF and IS-IS respectively.  However these specifications lack a
>    method to advertise PCEP security (e.g., Transport Layer
>    Security(TLS), TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO)) support
>    capability.
> 
>    This document proposes new capability flag bits for PCE-CAP-FLAGS
>    sub-TLV that can be announced as attribute in the IGP advertisement
>    to distribute PCEP security support information.  In addition, this
>    document updates RFC 5088 and RFC 5089 to allow advertisement of Key
>    ID or Key Chain Name Sub-TLV to support TCP AO security capability.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-
> support/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-03
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-
> support-03
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-
> support-03
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr