Subject: Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07.txt

From: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 15:19:48 +0000

Hi Acee,

Thanks for your review, comments and suggestions. We’ve incorporated them and posted an update for this draft.

Note that as requested in a separate email thread, the draft has been renamed so it is associated with the LSR WG instead of the old OSPF one : https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions/

This draft also has editorial changes to align with the latest version of the draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming and is functionally equivalent to the draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions.

The authors believe this version is ready for WG adoption as requested previously.

Thanks,
Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)

From: Lizhenbin <[email-masked]>
Sent: 16 December 2019 20:31
To: Acee Lindem (acee) <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: RE: Comments on draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07.txt

Hi Acee,
Thanks very much for your help to refine the draft. You suggestion also makes sense. We will update accordingly.

Best Regards,
Robin

From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 5:44 AM
To: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
Subject: Comments on draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07.txt

Hi Robin, et al,
One thing I’d like to see is incorporation of the text for the MSD types in the draft. It is less than one and a half pages and it doesn’t make sense to reference the IS-IS draft. I’ve also attached my editorial comments.

Thanks,
Acee